These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33652864)

  • 1. Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test in Patients with Stroke.
    Agustín RM; Crisostomo MJ; Sánchez-Martínez MP; Medina-Mirapeix F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 33652864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimal clinically important difference of the gait assessment and intervention tool for adults with stroke.
    Smith MG; Patritti BL
    Gait Posture; 2022 Jan; 91():212-215. PubMed ID: 34740058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic value of balance performance for improvements of community ambulation among stroke patients: a cohort study.
    Medina-Mirapeix F; Crisostomo MJ; Martín San Agustín R; Sánchez-Martínez MP
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Apr; 58(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 34498829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test as a functional outcome measure in COPD.
    Jones SE; Kon SS; Canavan JL; Patel MS; Clark AL; Nolan CM; Polkey MI; Man WD
    Thorax; 2013 Nov; 68(11):1015-20. PubMed ID: 23783372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Difference in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
    Trivedi P; Patel S; Edwards G; Jenkins T; Man WD; Nolan CM
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2024 Apr; 21(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 37847730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the five times sit-to-stand test in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: A six-month prospective cohort study.
    Amatachaya S; Khuna L; Thaweewannakij T
    Clin Rehabil; 2023 Jan; 37(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 36046885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimal clinically important difference of Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (GAIT) in patients with sub-acute stroke.
    Saengsuwan J; Vichiansiri R
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Dec; 57(6):874-878. PubMed ID: 34247469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful.
    Schmid A; Duncan PW; Studenski S; Lai SM; Richards L; Perera S; Wu SS
    Stroke; 2007 Jul; 38(7):2096-100. PubMed ID: 17510461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five times sit-to-stand test in subjects with total knee replacement: Reliability and relationship with functional mobility tests.
    Medina-Mirapeix F; Vivo-Fernández I; López-Cañizares J; García-Vidal JA; Benítez-Martínez JC; Del Baño-Aledo ME
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jan; 59():258-260. PubMed ID: 29102855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke.
    Mehrholz J; Wagner K; Rutte K; Meissner D; Pohl M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1314-9. PubMed ID: 17908575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.
    Chen P; Lin KC; Liing RJ; Wu CY; Chen CL; Chang KC
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1585-96. PubMed ID: 26714699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating clinically important change in gait speed in people with stroke undergoing outpatient rehabilitation.
    Fulk GD; Ludwig M; Dunning K; Golden S; Boyne P; West T
    J Neurol Phys Ther; 2011 Jun; 35(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 21934363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time dependency of walking classification in stroke.
    Kollen B; Kwakkel G; Lindeman E
    Phys Ther; 2006 May; 86(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 16649886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test and the 30-second sit-to-stand test to assess exercise tolerance in COPD patients.
    Zhang Q; Li YX; Li XL; Yin Y; Li RL; Qiao X; Li W; Ma HF; Ma WH; Han YF; Zeng GQ; Wang QY; Kang J; Hou G
    Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis; 2018; 13():2833-2839. PubMed ID: 30237707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimal clinically important difference of the lower-extremity fugl-meyer assessment in chronic-stroke.
    Pandian S; Arya KN; Kumar D
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 23(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 27086865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Value of five-repetition sit-to-stand test in clinical evaluation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].
    Lv YH; Zhu SF; Zeng XL; Chen YJ; Liu D; Mou JJ; Liu LY; Zou F
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2016 Apr; 36(4):477-81. PubMed ID: 27113173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deficits in functional performance and gait one year after total knee arthroplasty despite improved self-reported function.
    Naili JE; Iversen MD; Esbjörnsson AC; Hedström M; Schwartz MH; Häger CK; Broström EW
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3378-3386. PubMed ID: 27436196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and brief pain inventory in patients undergoing re-irradiation for painful bone metastases.
    Raman S; Ding K; Chow E; Meyer RM; van der Linden YM; Roos D; Hartsell WF; Hoskin P; Wu JSY; Nabid A; Haas R; Wiggenraad R; Babington S; Demas WF; Wilson CF; Wong RKS; Zhu L; Brundage M
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1089-1098. PubMed ID: 29188483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-Minute Walk Test in People With Stroke.
    Fulk GD; He Y
    J Neurol Phys Ther; 2018 Oct; 42(4):235-240. PubMed ID: 30138230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools.
    Alma HJ; de Jong C; Jelusic D; Wittmann M; Schuler M; Kollen BJ; Sanderman R; Schultz K; Kocks JWH; Van der Molen T
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Jun; 16(1):130. PubMed ID: 29940980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.