These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33654362)

  • 21. The benefit of adding oral simethicone in bowel preparation regimen for the detection of colon adenoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yeh JH; Hsu MH; Tseng CM; Chen TH; Huang RY; Lee CT; Lin CW; Wang WL
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 34(5):830-836. PubMed ID: 30311262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Educational interventions are associated with improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Causada-Calo NS; Gonzalez-Moreno EI; Bishay K; Shorr R; Dube C; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Rostom A; Walsh C; Anderson JT; Keswani RN; Scaffidi MA; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Oct; 8(10):E1321-E1331. PubMed ID: 33015334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp detection rate of water exchange, Endocuff, and cap colonoscopy: A network meta-analysis.
    Shao PP; Shao CR; Romero T; Leung FW
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Dec; 36(12):3268-3277. PubMed ID: 34622488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of Endoscopists' Personality Traits on Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy: A KASID Multicenter Study.
    Jung Y; Cha JM; Lee NH; Joo YE; Lee YJ; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Shin JE; Yang HJ; Lee J; Kim KO; Kim JW; Na SY; Boo SJ; Kim JH; Han MJ; Hwangbo Y; Huh KC
    Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Aug; 65(8):2302-2310. PubMed ID: 32157497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.
    Aniwan S; Orkoonsawat P; Viriyautsahakul V; Angsuwatcharakon P; Pittayanon R; Wisedopas N; Sumdin S; Ponuthai Y; Wiangngoen S; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 26809333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bishay K; Causada-Calo N; Scaffidi MA; Walsh CM; Anderson JT; Rostom A; Dube C; Keswani RN; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Shorr R; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Nov; 92(5):1030-1040.e9. PubMed ID: 32330506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate.
    Buerger M; Kasper P; Allo G; Gillessen J; Schramm C
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):190. PubMed ID: 31730463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of hyoscine-N-butylbromide on adenoma detection during colonoscopy: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled studies.
    Rondonotti E; Zolk O; Amato A; Paggi S; Baccarin A; Spinzi G; Radaelli F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1103-12.e2. PubMed ID: 25053528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hassan C; Spadaccini M; Iannone A; Maselli R; Jovani M; Chandrasekar VT; Antonelli G; Yu H; Areia M; Dinis-Ribeiro M; Bhandari P; Sharma P; Rex DK; Rösch T; Wallace M; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Jan; 93(1):77-85.e6. PubMed ID: 32598963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
    Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High-definition colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate.
    Jrebi NY; Hefty M; Jalouta T; Ogilvie J; Davis AT; Asgeirsson T; Luchtefeld M
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 27287897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Expert endoscopists with high adenoma detection rates frequently detect diminutive adenomas in proximal colon.
    Toyoshima O; Nishizawa T; Yoshida S; Sekiba K; Kataoka Y; Hata K; Watanabe H; Tsuji Y; Koike K
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E775-E782. PubMed ID: 32490163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multidirectional Colonoscopy Quality Improvement Increases Adenoma Detection Rate: Results of the Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center Colonoscopy Quality Upgrade Project (Gangnam-CUP).
    Seo JY; Jin EH; Bae JH; Lim JH; Chung GE; Lee C; Kwak MS; Kang HY; Song JH; Yang SY; Yang JI; Lim SH; Yim JY; Kim JS; Chung SJ
    Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Jun; 65(6):1806-1815. PubMed ID: 31732905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
    Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic review with meta-analysis: impact of one-handed vs. two-handed technique on quality outcomes of colonoscopy.
    Imperatore N; De Palma GD; Dolce P; Grassano A; Caporaso N; Rispo A
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Sep; 23(17):7663-7673. PubMed ID: 31539159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Endoscopic technological innovations for neoplasia detection in organized colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Thayalasekaran S; Frazzoni L; Antonelli G; Fuccio L; Radaelli F; Andrealli A; Senore C; Repici A; Hassan C; Bhandari P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Oct; 92(4):840-847.e9. PubMed ID: 32590053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of EndoRings on colon adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Facciorusso A; Mohan BP; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Feb; 36(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 33140884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit.
    Abdelfatah MM; Elhanafi S; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):1148-1157. PubMed ID: 28643529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.