BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3365478)

  • 1. Guilty but mentally ill: the South Carolina experience.
    Morgan DW; McCullough TM; Jenkins PL; White WM
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 3365478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Juror knowledge and attitudes regarding mental illness verdicts.
    Sloat LM; Frierson RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 15985664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The guilty but mentally ill verdict: a review and conceptual analysis of intent and impact.
    Palmer CA; Hazelrigg M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10774841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opinions concerning the insanity plea and criminality among mental patients.
    Pasewark RA; Seidenzahl D
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 540170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guilty but mentally ill: a retreat from the insanity defense.
    Sherman SL
    Am J Law Med; 1981; 7(2):237-64. PubMed ID: 7304614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dangerous mentally disordered criminals: unresolvable societal fear?
    Leong GB; Silva JA; Weinstock R
    J Forensic Sci; 1991 Jan; 36(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 2007869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interface between the Criminal Justice System and the Mental Health System in Canada.
    Kunjukrishnan R; Bradford JM
    Psychiatr J Univ Ott; 1985 Mar; 10(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 3889956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new look at the insanity defense in Texas.
    Dudley HK; Miller GE; Reinehr RC; Mascot PJ
    Tex Med; 1984 Jun; 80(6):62-7. PubMed ID: 6740521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
    Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Migration of Arizona's Post-Insanity Defense Procedures to a Modified GBMI Model.
    Kirkorsky SE; Shao W; Bloom JD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Jun; 47(2):217-223. PubMed ID: 31028103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Punishing the insane: the verdict of guilty but mentally ill.
    Melville JD; Naimark D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(4):553-5. PubMed ID: 12539912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reassessing the aftercare treatment of individuals found not guilty due to a mental disability in Hunan, China: supplemental study into the disposition of mentally ill offenders after forensic psychiatric assessment.
    Wang X; Zhang D; Jiang S; Bai Y; Cucolo HE; Perlin ML
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 41(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 17464720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disposition of insanity defense cases in Oregon.
    Bloom JL; Bloom JD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 7317657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A criminal psychiatric study. Review of records on 103 people sentenced to hospitalization or treatment 1970-78].
    Kofoed-Nielsen H; Odgaard K
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1983 Apr; 145(16):1241-5. PubMed ID: 6879753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of female versus male insanity acquittees in Colorado.
    Seig A; Ball E; Menninger JA
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(4):523-32. PubMed ID: 8639980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Supreme Court and the mentally disabled criminal defendant: recent developments.
    Perlin ML
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(4):391-409. PubMed ID: 3427241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal outcome and clinical findings: a study of insanity evaluations.
    Rogers R; Cavanaugh JL; Seman W; Harris M
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 6713107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competency, civil commitment, and the dangerousness of the mentally ill.
    Bittman BJ; Convit A
    J Forensic Sci; 1993 Nov; 38(6):1460-6. PubMed ID: 8263487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.