158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33656012)
1. Measuring the Effect of Examiner Variability in a Multiple-Circuit Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
Yeates P; Moult A; Cope N; McCray G; Xilas E; Lovelock T; Vaughan N; Daw D; Fuller R; McKinley RKB
Acad Med; 2021 Aug; 96(8):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 33656012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs.
Yeates P; Cope N; Hawarden A; Bradshaw H; McCray G; Homer M
Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 53(3):250-263. PubMed ID: 30575092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using video-based examiner score comparison and adjustment (VESCA) to compare the influence of examiners at different sites in a distributed objective structured clinical exam (OSCE).
Yeates P; Maluf A; Cope N; McCray G; McBain S; Beardow D; Fuller R; McKinley RB
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Oct; 23(1):803. PubMed ID: 37885005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining the influence of different linking patterns on the stability of students' score adjustments produced using Video-based Examiner Score Comparison and Adjustment (VESCA).
Yeates P; McCray G; Moult A; Cope N; Fuller R; McKinley R
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 35039023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners.
Zimmermann P; Kadmon M
GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc40. PubMed ID: 32685668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining influence, interaction and causality of contrast and sequence effects in objective structured clinical exams.
Yeates P; Moult A; Cope N; McCray G; Fuller R; McKinley R
Med Educ; 2022 Mar; 56(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 34893998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancing authenticity, diagnosticity and
Yeates P; Maluf A; Kinston R; Cope N; McCray G; Cullen K; O'Neill V; Cole A; Goodfellow R; Vallender R; Chung CW; McKinley RK; Fuller R; Wong G
BMJ Open; 2022 Dec; 12(12):e064387. PubMed ID: 36600366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hawks, Doves and Rasch decisions: Understanding the influence of different cycles of an OSCE on students' scores using Many Facet Rasch Modeling.
Yeates P; Sebok-Syer SS
Med Teach; 2017 Jan; 39(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 27897083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Changing Examiner Stations During UK Postgraduate Surgery Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Influence Examination Reliability and Candidates' Scores?
Brennan PA; Croke DT; Reed M; Smith L; Munro E; Foulkes J; Arnett R
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 26923102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using the Many-Facet Rasch Model to analyse and evaluate the quality of objective structured clinical examination: a non-experimental cross-sectional design.
Tavakol M; Pinner G
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e029208. PubMed ID: 31494607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examiners' Perceptions in Surgical Education: The Blind Spot in the Assessment of OSCEs.
van der Want AC; Bloemendaal PM; van der Hage JA
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(2):590-596. PubMed ID: 32819870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Video Recording in Veterinary Medicine OSCEs: Feasibility and Inter-rater Agreement between Live Performance Examiners and Video Recording Reviewing Examiners.
Tan JY; Ma IWY; Hunt JA; Kwong GPS; Farrell R; Bell C; Read EK
J Vet Med Educ; 2021 Aug; 48(4):485-491. PubMed ID: 32758091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study.
Kim KJ; Kim G
Korean J Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 32(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 32130851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomised controlled pilot trial of the influence of non-native English accents on examiners' scores in OSCEs.
Kozato A; Patel N; Shikino K
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Aug; 20(1):268. PubMed ID: 32799871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of training in student examiner rating performance in a student-led mock OSCE.
Koo JH; Ong KY; Yap YT; Tham KY
Perspect Med Educ; 2021 Oct; 10(5):293-298. PubMed ID: 33351173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study.
Inayah AT; Anwer LA; Shareef MA; Nurhussen A; Alkabbani HM; Alzahrani AA; Obad AS; Zafar M; Afsar NA
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e012289. PubMed ID: 28487454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using cultural historical activity theory to reflect on the sociocultural complexities in OSCE examiners' judgements.
Wong WYA; Thistlethwaite J; Moni K; Roberts C
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Mar; 28(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 35943605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing clinical reasoning in the OSCE: pilot-testing a novel oral debrief exercise.
Régent A; Thampy H; Singh M
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Oct; 23(1):718. PubMed ID: 37789308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Towards a more nuanced conceptualisation of differential examiner stringency in OSCEs.
Homer M
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):919-934. PubMed ID: 37843678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance?
Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh DM; Su C; Wood T
Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24606627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
