BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33656522)

  • 1. Derivation and Validation of a 4-Level Clinical Pretest Probability Score for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism to Safely Decrease Imaging Testing.
    Roy PM; Friou E; Germeau B; Douillet D; Kline JA; Righini M; Le Gal G; Moumneh T; Penaloza A
    JAMA Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 6(6):669-677. PubMed ID: 33656522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the 4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score (4PEPS) in the diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism: An external validation study.
    Stals MAM; Beenen LFM; Coppens M; Faber LM; Hofstee HMA; Hovens MMC; Huisman MV; van der Hulle T; Kaasjager KAH; Kruip MJHA; Mairuhu ATA; Middeldorp S; Ten Wolde M; Klok FA; van Es N;
    Thromb Res; 2023 Nov; 231():65-75. PubMed ID: 37816274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.
    Righini M; Van Es J; Den Exter PL; Roy PM; Verschuren F; Ghuysen A; Rutschmann OT; Sanchez O; Jaffrelot M; Trinh-Duc A; Le Gall C; Moustafa F; Principe A; Van Houten AA; Ten Wolde M; Douma RA; Hazelaar G; Erkens PM; Van Kralingen KW; Grootenboers MJ; Durian MF; Cheung YW; Meyer G; Bounameaux H; Huisman MV; Kamphuisen PW; Le Gal G
    JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(11):1117-24. PubMed ID: 24643601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of YEARS, PEGeD, 4PEPS or the sole item "PE is the most likely diagnosis" strategies for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: post-hoc analysis of two European cohort studies.
    Roussel M; Gorlicki J; Douillet D; Moumneh T; Bérard L; Cachanado M; Chauvin A; Roy PM; Freund Y
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2022 Oct; 29(5):341-347. PubMed ID: 36062433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer.
    Wells PS; Anderson DR; Rodger M; Stiell I; Dreyer JF; Barnes D; Forgie M; Kovacs G; Ward J; Kovacs MJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Jul; 135(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 11453709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.
    Kabrhel C
    J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of a Diagnostic Strategy Using an Elevated and Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Threshold on Thromboembolic Events in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Freund Y; Chauvin A; Jimenez S; Philippon AL; Curac S; Fémy F; Gorlicki J; Chouihed T; Goulet H; Montassier E; Dumont M; Lozano Polo L; Le Borgne P; Khellaf M; Bouzid D; Raynal PA; Abdessaied N; Laribi S; Guenezan J; Ganansia O; Bloom B; Miró O; Cachanado M; Simon T
    JAMA; 2021 Dec; 326(21):2141-2149. PubMed ID: 34874418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is stand-alone D-dimer testing safe to rule out acute pulmonary embolism?
    van Es N; van der Hulle T; Büller HR; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Galipienzo J; Di Nisio M
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Feb; 15(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27873439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: prospective validation of the simplified Geneva score.
    Robert-Ebadi H; Mostaguir K; Hovens MM; Kare M; Verschuren F; Girard P; Huisman MV; Moustafa F; Kamphuisen PW; Buller HR; Righini M; Le Gal G
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Sep; 15(9):1764-1769. PubMed ID: 28688113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Crane S; Jaconelli T; Eragat M
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2018 Jun; 25(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 28002070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter US study.
    Kline JA; Nelson RD; Jackson RE; Courtney DM
    Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Feb; 39(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 11823768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.
    Raja AS; Greenberg JO; Qaseem A; Denberg TD; Fitterman N; Schuur JD;
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 163(9):701-11. PubMed ID: 26414967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of "Gestalt" and the Wells Rule.
    Hendriksen JM; Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Geersing GJ
    Ann Fam Med; 2016 May; 14(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 27184993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of the simplify D-dimer assay for pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients.
    Kline JA; Runyon MS; Webb WB; Jones AE; Mitchell AM
    Chest; 2006 Jun; 129(6):1417-23. PubMed ID: 16778257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid quantitative D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort management study.
    Bates SM; Takach Lapner S; Douketis JD; Kearon C; Julian J; Parpia S; Schulman S; Weitz JI; Linkins LA; Crowther M; Lim W; Spencer FA; Lee AY; Gross PL; Ginsberg J
    J Thromb Haemost; 2016 Mar; 14(3):504-9. PubMed ID: 26707364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Steady-state end-tidal alveolar dead space fraction and D-dimer: bedside tests to exclude pulmonary embolism.
    Rodger MA; Jones G; Rasuli P; Raymond F; Djunaedi H; Bredeson CN; Wells PS
    Chest; 2001 Jul; 120(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 11451825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex-specific performance of pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms for pulmonary embolism.
    van Mens TE; van der Pol LM; van Es N; Bistervels IM; Mairuhu ATA; van der Hulle T; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Middeldorp S
    J Thromb Haemost; 2018 May; 16(5):858-865. PubMed ID: 29460484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.
    Wells PS; Anderson DR; Rodger M; Ginsberg JS; Kearon C; Gent M; Turpie AG; Bormanis J; Weitz J; Chamberlain M; Bowie D; Barnes D; Hirsh J
    Thromb Haemost; 2000 Mar; 83(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 10744147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multicenter Evaluation of the YEARS Criteria in Emergency Department Patients Evaluated for Pulmonary Embolism.
    Kabrhel C; Van Hylckama Vlieg A; Muzikanski A; Singer A; Fermann GJ; Francis S; Limkakeng A; Chang AM; Giordano N; Parry B
    Acad Emerg Med; 2018 Sep; 25(9):987-994. PubMed ID: 29603819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A critical appraisal of non-invasive diagnosis and exclusion of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: how many tests do we need?
    Michiels JJ; Gadisseur A; Van Der Planken M; Schroyens W; De Maeseneer M; Hermsen JT; Trienekens PH; Hoogsteden H; Pattynama PM
    Int Angiol; 2005 Mar; 24(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 15876996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.