124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33657542)
1. Effect of skull thickness and conductivity on current propagation for noninvasively injected currents.
Forssell M; Goswami C; Krishnan A; Chamanzar M; Grover P
J Neural Eng; 2021 May; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33657542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-Subject Variability of Skull Conductivity and Thickness in Calibrated Realistic Head Models.
Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Aydin Ü; Khan A; Gross J; Zervakis M; Rampp S; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117353. PubMed ID: 32919058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
Gençer NG; Acar CE
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skull Modeling Effects in Conductivity Estimates Using Parametric Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Fernandez-Corazza M; Turovets S; Luu P; Price N; Muravchik CH; Tucker D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1785-1797. PubMed ID: 29989921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does participant's age impact on tDCS induced fields? Insights from computational simulations.
McCann H; Beltrachini L
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Jun; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34038881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhanced tES and tDCS computational models by meninges emulation.
Jiang J; Truong DQ; Esmaeilpour Z; Huang Y; Badran BW; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2020 Jan; 17(1):016027. PubMed ID: 31689695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Software Toolbox for Low-Frequency Conductivity and Current Density Imaging Using MRI.
Sajib SZK; Katoch N; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2505-2514. PubMed ID: 28767360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel bounded EIT protocol to generate inhomogeneous skull conductivity maps non-invasively.
Fernandez-Corazza M; Turovets S; Muravchik CH
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():1440-1443. PubMed ID: 33018261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel method for calibrating head models to account for variability in conductivity and its evaluation in a sphere model.
Schrader S; Antonakakis M; Rampp S; Engwer C; Wolters CH
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245043. PubMed ID: 33113524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Head phantoms for bioelectromagnetic applications: a material study.
Hunold A; Machts R; Haueisen J
Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Nov; 19(1):87. PubMed ID: 33228687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computational representation of a realistic head and brain volume conductor model: electroencephalography simulation and visualization study.
Kybartaite A
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1144-55. PubMed ID: 23109383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model.
Suh HS; Lee WH; Kim TS
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6961-80. PubMed ID: 23044667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anisotropic spherical head model and its application to imaging electric activity of the brain.
Petrov Y
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Jul; 86(1 Pt 1):011917. PubMed ID: 23005462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-layer skull approximations perform well in transcranial direct current stimulation modeling.
Rampersad SM; Stegeman DF; Oostendorp TF
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 May; 21(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 22855232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regional head tissue conductivity estimation for improved EEG analysis.
Ferree TC; Eriksen KJ; Tucker DM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Dec; 47(12):1584-92. PubMed ID: 11125593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison study of different head model structures with homogeneous/inhomogeneous conductivity.
Wen P; Li Y
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2001 Mar; 24(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11458570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
