These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33658962)
1. Determining the Number of Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling. Nájera P; Abad FJ; Sorrel MA Front Psychol; 2021; 12():614470. PubMed ID: 33658962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive Diagnostic Models With Attribute Hierarchies: Model Estimation With a Restricted Q-Matrix Design. Tu D; Wang S; Cai Y; Douglas J; Chang HH Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 43(4):255-271. PubMed ID: 31156279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving Robustness in Q-Matrix Validation Using an Iterative and Dynamic Procedure. Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):431-446. PubMed ID: 32788815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models. Ma C; Ouyang J; Xu G Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):175-207. PubMed ID: 35596101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of Fit Indices in Choosing Correct Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Q-Matrices. Lei PW; Li H Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Sep; 40(6):405-417. PubMed ID: 29881062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model. de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation approaches in cognitive diagnosis modeling when attributes are hierarchically structured. Akbay L; de la Torre J Psicothema; 2020 Feb; 32(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 31954425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation. de la Torre J; Chiu CY Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 25943366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconsidering Cutoff Points in the General Method of Empirical Q-Matrix Validation. Nájera P; Sorrel MA; Abad FJ Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):727-753. PubMed ID: 32655181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Procedure for Assessing the Completeness of the Q-Matrices of Cognitively Diagnostic Tests. Köhn HF; Chiu CY Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):112-132. PubMed ID: 27714544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification. Ma W; Iaconangelo C; de la Torre J Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 May; 40(3):200-217. PubMed ID: 29881048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q-matrix validation. Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():110-130. PubMed ID: 33231301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment. Yu X; Cheng Y Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():145-179. PubMed ID: 31762007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validating a Reading Assessment Within the Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Framework: Q-Matrix Construction and Model Comparisons for Different Primary Grades. Li Y; Zhen M; Liu J Front Psychol; 2021; 12():786612. PubMed ID: 34975681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Optimal Choice of Cognitive Diagnostic Model for Second Language Listening Comprehension Test. Dong Y; Ma X; Wang C; Gao X Front Psychol; 2021; 12():608320. PubMed ID: 33935863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning Large Q-Matrix by Restricted Boltzmann Machines. Li C; Ma C; Xu G Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):1010-1041. PubMed ID: 35089496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers]. Mackinnon A; Mulligan R Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):31-43. PubMed ID: 15971638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Tutorial on Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling for Characterizing Mental Health Symptom Profiles Using Existing Item Responses. Tan Z; de la Torre J; Ma W; Huh D; Larimer ME; Mun EY Prev Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(3):480-492. PubMed ID: 35113299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cognitive Diagnostic Models for Random Guessing Behaviors. Hsu CL; Jin KY; Chiu MM Front Psychol; 2020; 11():570365. PubMed ID: 33101139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]