234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33659076)
1. Comparative study of the influence of imaging resolution on linear retardance parameters derived from the Mueller matrix.
Shen Y; Huang R; He H; Liu S; Dong Y; Wu J; Ma H
Biomed Opt Express; 2021 Jan; 12(1):211-225. PubMed ID: 33659076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analyzing the Influence of Imaging Resolution on Polarization Properties of Scattering Media Obtained From Mueller Matrix.
Shao C; Chen B; He H; He C; Shen Y; Zhai H; Ma H
Front Chem; 2022; 10():936255. PubMed ID: 35903191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of the imaging contrasts of Mueller matrix derived parameters between transmission and backscattering polarimetry.
Liu T; Sun T; He H; Liu S; Dong Y; Wu J; Ma H
Biomed Opt Express; 2018 Sep; 9(9):4413-4428. PubMed ID: 30615708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probing variations of fibrous structures during the development of breast ductal carcinoma tissues via Mueller matrix imaging.
Dong Y; Liu S; Shen Y; He H; Ma H
Biomed Opt Express; 2020 Sep; 11(9):4960-4975. PubMed ID: 33014593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distinguishing structural features between Crohn's disease and gastrointestinal luminal tuberculosis using Mueller matrix derived parameters.
Liu T; Lu M; Chen B; Zhong Q; Li J; He H; Mao H; Ma H
J Biophotonics; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e201900151. PubMed ID: 31465142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitatively characterizing the microstructural features of breast ductal carcinoma tissues in different progression stages by Mueller matrix microscope.
Dong Y; Qi J; He H; He C; Liu S; Wu J; Elson DS; Ma H
Biomed Opt Express; 2017 Aug; 8(8):3643-3655. PubMed ID: 28856041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential Mueller matrix imaging of partially depolarizing optically anisotropic biological tissues.
Trifonyuk L; Sdobnov A; Baranowski W; Ushenko V; Olar O; Dubolazov A; Pidkamin L; Sidor M; Vanchuliak O; Motrich A; Gorsky M; Meglinski I
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(4):877-891. PubMed ID: 31749042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between image texture and polarization features in histopathology.
Liu Y; Dong Y; Si L; Meng R; Dong Y; Ma H
Biomed Opt Express; 2021 Mar; 12(3):1593-1608. PubMed ID: 33796375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization and classification of ductal carcinoma tissue using four channel based stokes-mueller polarimetry and machine learning.
Ku S; Kaniyala Melanthota S; U R; Rai S; Mahato KK; Mazumder N
Lasers Med Sci; 2024 May; 39(1):123. PubMed ID: 38703302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polar decomposition of 3 x 3 Mueller matrix: a tool for quantitative tissue polarimetry.
Swami MK; Manhas S; Buddhiwant P; Ghosh N; Uppal A; Gupta PK
Opt Express; 2006 Oct; 14(20):9324-37. PubMed ID: 19529316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mueller matrix-based characterization of cervical tissue sections: a quantitative comparison of polar and differential decomposition methods.
Kumar N; Kumar Nayak J; Pradhan A; Ghosh N
J Biomed Opt; 2024 May; 29(5):052916. PubMed ID: 38328279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of tissue polarimetric properties using Stokes polarimetric imaging with circularly polarized illumination.
Qi J; He H; Lin J; Dong Y; Chen D; Ma H; Elson DS
J Biophotonics; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e201700139. PubMed ID: 29131523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polarization enhancement mechanism from tissue staining in multispectral Mueller matrix microscopy.
Shi Y; Chen C; Deng L; Zeng N; Li H; Liu Z; He H; He C; Ma H
Opt Lett; 2024 Jun; 49(12):3356-3359. PubMed ID: 38875619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of tissue microstructure with Mueller microscopy: logarithmic decomposition and Monte Carlo modeling.
Li P; Lee HR; Chandel S; Lotz C; Groeber-Becker FK; Dembski S; Ossikovski R; Ma H; Novikova T
J Biomed Opt; 2020 Jan; 25(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 31933331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of hematoxylin and eosin staining on linear birefringence measurement of fibrous tissue structures in polarization microscopy.
Deng L; Chen C; Yu W; Shao C; Shen Z; Wang Y; He C; Li H; Liu Z; He H; Ma H
J Biomed Opt; 2023 Oct; 28(10):102909. PubMed ID: 37786544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying optical anisotropy in soft tissue membranes using Mueller matrix imaging.
Dixon AW; Taberner AJ; Nash MP; Nielsen PMF
J Biomed Opt; 2021 Oct; 26(10):. PubMed ID: 34617423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of microfibril angles in bamboo using Mueller matrix imaging.
Mannan S; Zaffar M; Pradhan A; Basu S
Appl Opt; 2016 Nov; 55(32):8971-8978. PubMed ID: 27857282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of differential matrix and extended polar decomposition formalisms for polarimetric characterization of complex tissue-like turbid media.
Kumar S; Purwar H; Ossikovski R; Vitkin IA; Ghosh N
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Oct; 17(10):105006. PubMed ID: 23064484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical stability of polarization signatures in biological tissue characterization.
Chen Y; Chu J; Xin B; Qi J
Biomed Opt Express; 2024 Apr; 15(4):2652-2665. PubMed ID: 38633097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linear diattenuation imaging of biological tissues with near infrared Mueller scanning microscopy.
Dubreuil M; Tissier F; Rivet S; Grand YL
Biomed Opt Express; 2021 Jan; 12(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 33659070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
