146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3365967)
1. Trends in allergic contact sensitization.
Gollhausen R; Enders F; Przybilla B; Burg G; Ring J
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Mar; 18(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 3365967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Epicutaneous testing with a standard series. Results in 12,026 patients].
Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J; Burg G; Braun-Falco O
Hautarzt; 1988 Dec; 39(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 2976753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patch testing with European and American standard allergens in Japanese patients.
Hirano S; Yoshikawa K
Contact Dermatitis; 1982 Jan; 8(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 7067439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Albert MR; González S; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey.
Akyol A; Boyvat A; Peksari Y; Gürgey E
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):333-7. PubMed ID: 15932585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epicutaneous patch test results in children and adults with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county: a retrospective survey.
Kuljanac I; Knežević E; Cvitanović H
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2011; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 21703155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contact dermatitis in the West of Scotland.
Husain SL
Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 580079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America--1984 to 1985.
Storrs FJ; Rosenthal LE; Adams RM; Clendenning W; Emmett EA; Fisher AA; Larsen WG; Maibach HI; Rietschel RL; Schorr WF
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Jun; 20(6):1038-45. PubMed ID: 2754054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey.
Akasya-Hillenbrand E; Ozkaya-Bayazit E
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jan; 46(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11918582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time trends of contact allergy to the European baseline series in Lithuania.
Linauskienė K; Malinauskienė L; Blažienė A
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jun; 76(6):350-356. PubMed ID: 27917496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitizations to allergens of the European standard series at the Department of Dermatology in Zurich 1990-1994.
Bangha E; Elsner P
Dermatology; 1996; 193(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8864612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in Patch Testing With the Mayo Clinic Standard Series, 2011-2015.
Veverka KK; Hall MR; Yiannias JA; Drage LA; El-Azhary RA; Killian JM; Johnson JS; Nordberg Linehan DL; Singh N; Davis MDP
Dermatitis; 2018; 29(6):310-315. PubMed ID: 30422883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006.
Zug KA; Warshaw EM; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Belsito DL; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Mathias CG; Deleo VA; Rietschel RL; Marks J
Dermatitis; 2009; 20(3):149-60. PubMed ID: 19470301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standard patch test results in 3,225 consecutive Danish patient from 1973 to 1977.
Hammershøy O
Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jun; 6(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 6447035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epidemiological survey of occupational contact dermatitis of the hands in Belgium.
Lachapelle JM; Tennstedt D
Contact Dermatitis; 1979 Jul; 5(4):244-8. PubMed ID: 498769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens.
Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Nethercott JR; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1998 Jun; 38(6 Pt 1):911-8. PubMed ID: 9631997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive concomitant test reactions to allergens in the standard patch test series.
Landeck L; González E; Baden L; Neumann K; Schalock P
Int J Dermatol; 2010 May; 49(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 20534085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
