139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33660000)
1. Adnexal surgery at the time of hysterectomy in women 65 years and older undergoing hysterectomy for prolapse: do practice trends differ by route of surgery?
Greene KA; Wyman AM; Tamhane N; Tanner JP; Bassaly RM; Salemi JL
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2185-2193. PubMed ID: 33660000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National trends of adnexal surgeries at the time of hysterectomy for benign indication, United States, 1998-2011.
Mikhail E; Salemi JL; Mogos MF; Hart S; Salihu HM; Imudia AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):713.e1-13. PubMed ID: 25935772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting the feasibility of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse.
Dain L; Abramov Y
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Aug; 51(4):307-9. PubMed ID: 21806584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LAVH superior to TVH when concomitant salpingo-oophorectomy is intended in prolapse hysterectomy: a comparative cohort study.
Mothes AR; Schlachetzki A; Nicolaus K; Vorwergk J; Lehmann T; Radosa MP; Mothes HK; Runnebaum IB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Dec; 298(6):1131-1137. PubMed ID: 30306309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of Oophorectomy at the Time of Vaginal Hysterectomy in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Lua LL; Kosiorek HE; Wasson MN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1063-1069. PubMed ID: 30343033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic assessment of surgical complications in laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Mothes AR; Radosa MP; Runnebaum IB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():228-32. PubMed ID: 26451889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term risk of adnexal operation after vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organs prolapse repair.
Geron Y; From A; Matot R; Peled Y; Eitan R; Krissi H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Mar; 294():1-3. PubMed ID: 38163397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.
Antosh DD; High R; Brown HW; Oliphant SS; Abed H; Philip N; Grimes CL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):605.e1-605.e5. PubMed ID: 28734829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions.
Jacoby VL; Vittinghoff E; Nakagawa S; Jackson R; Richter HE; Chan J; Kuppermann M
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 113(6):1259-1267. PubMed ID: 19461420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic assistance after vaginal hysterectomy and unsuccessful access to the ovaries or failed uterine mobilization: changing trends.
Sizzi O; Paparella P; Bonito C; Paparella R; Rossetti A
JSLS; 2004; 8(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 15554277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy on pelvic organ prolapse: results from the Women's Health Initiative trial.
Shveiky D; Kudish BI; Iglesia CB; Park AJ; Sokol AI; Lehman AM; Shara N; Howard BV
Menopause; 2015 May; 22(5):483-8. PubMed ID: 25423323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risks and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy: a decision analysis.
Cadish LA; Shepherd JP; Barber EL; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):603.e1-603.e6. PubMed ID: 28619689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends of Bilateral Salpingectomy During Vaginal Hysterectomy With and Without Laparoscopic Assistance Performed for Benign Indications in the United States.
Mikhail E; Salemi JL; Wyman A; Salihu HM; Imudia AN; Hart S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1063-1069.e1. PubMed ID: 27448507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adnexectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Slopnick EA; Sheyn DD; Chapman GC; Mahajan ST; El-Nashar S; Hijaz AK
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):373-379. PubMed ID: 31115610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a feasibility study for further evaluation in randomized trials.
Nwosu CR; Gupta JK
Surg Endosc; 1999 Feb; 13(2):148-50. PubMed ID: 9918618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.
Houlihan S; Kim-Fine S; Birch C; Tang S; Brennand EA
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 30393822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Rational laparoscopic intervention in laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH): prospective study].
Kuzel D; Fucíková Z; Cibula D; Tóth D; Zivný J
Ceska Gynekol; 1999 Apr; 64(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 10510549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.
Ross WT; Meister MR; Shepherd JP; Olsen MA; Lowder JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):436.e1-436.e8. PubMed ID: 28716634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
