407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33660122)
1. Risk of chyle leak after robotic versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
Dezube AR; Kucukak S; De León LE; Kostopanagiotou K; Jaklitsch MT; Wee JO
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1332-1338. PubMed ID: 33660122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Thoracoscopic or Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
Booka E; Kikuchi H; Haneda R; Soneda W; Kawata S; Murakami T; Matsumoto T; Hiramatsu Y; Takeuchi H
Anticancer Res; 2021 Sep; 41(9):4455-4462. PubMed ID: 34475069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Tan Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Fu J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):995-998. PubMed ID: 27680066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic Esophagectomy Trends and Early Surgical Outcomes: The US Experience.
Khaitan PG; Vekstein AM; Thibault D; Kosinski A; Hartwig MG; Block M; Gaissert H; Wolf AS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 115(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 36470561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.
Grimminger PP; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Corvinus F; Babic B; Lang H
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 67(7):589-596. PubMed ID: 30216947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a matched-pair single-center cohort analysis.
Chouliaras K; Attwood K; Brady M; Takahashi H; Peng JS; Yendamuri S; Demmy TL; Hochwald SN; Kukar M
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35758409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with single-utility incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of mid-lower esophageal cancer.
Guo W; Ma L; Zhang Y; Ma X; Yang S; Zhu X; Zhang J; Zhang Y; Xiang J; Li H
Dis Esophagus; 2016; 29(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 25515694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning curve in robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer is not steep after experience in video-assisted lobectomy; single-surgeon experience using cumulative sum analysis.
Andersson SE; Ilonen IK; Pälli OH; Salo JA; Räsänen JV
Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2021; 27():100362. PubMed ID: 33838571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.
Turner KM; Delman AM; Johnson K; Patel SH; Wilson GC; Shah SA; Van Haren RM
J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():152-160. PubMed ID: 36410231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.
Fujita T; Sato K; Ozaki A; Akutsu T; Fujiwara H; Kojima T; Daiko H
World J Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(8):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 35499646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution.
Ekeke CN; Kuiper GM; Luketich JD; Ruppert KM; Copelli SJ; Baker N; Levy RM; Awais O; Christie NA; Dhupar R; Pennathur A; Sarkaria IS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Aug; 166(2):374-382.e1. PubMed ID: 36732144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevention of postoperative chylothorax with thoracic duct ligation during video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer.
Guo W; Zhao YP; Jiang YG; Niu HJ; Liu XH; Ma Z; Wang RW
Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1332-6. PubMed ID: 22044984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter Experience in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy - a Comparison of Hybrid and Totally Robot-Assisted Techniques.
Grimminger PP; Staubitz JI; Perez D; Ghadban T; Reeh M; Scognamiglio P; Izbicki JR; Biebl M; Fuchs H; Bruns CJ; Lang H; Becker T; Egberts JH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Oct; 25(10):2463-2469. PubMed ID: 34145494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Yüksel S; Topal U; Songür MZ; Çalıkoğlu İ; Karaköse E; Ercan E; Teke Z; Bektaş H
J Cancer Res Ther; 2024 Jan; 20(1):410-416. PubMed ID: 38554354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
