405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33660122)
41. Hospital cost and clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: A propensity score-weighted comparison.
Kneuertz PJ; Singer E; D'Souza DM; Abdel-Rasoul M; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Merritt RE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 May; 157(5):2018-2026.e2. PubMed ID: 30819575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Impact of Robotic Approach on Post-Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
Wu J; Putnam LR; Silva JP; Houghton C; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
Am Surg; 2022 Oct; 88(10):2499-2507. PubMed ID: 35652374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Analysis of training pathway to reach expert performance levels based on proficiency-based progression in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
Müller DT; Brunner S; Straatman J; Babic B; Eckhoff JA; Reisewitz A; Storms C; Schiffmann LM; Schmidt T; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7305-7316. PubMed ID: 37580580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Outcomes of robotic versus non-robotic minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP database analysis.
Harbison GJ; Vossler JD; Yim NH; Murayama KM
Am J Surg; 2019 Dec; 218(6):1223-1228. PubMed ID: 31500797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Casas MA; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Schlottmann F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):473-481. PubMed ID: 34955315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The usefulness of three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.
Yamashita K; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Imamura Y; Watanabe M
Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 16(3):272-277. PubMed ID: 30888533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.
Yang Y; Li B; Yi J; Hua R; Chen H; Tan L; Li H; He Y; Guo X; Sun Y; Yu B; Li Z
Ann Surg; 2022 Apr; 275(4):646-653. PubMed ID: 34171870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center.
de Groot EM; Goense L; Kingma BF; van den Berg JW; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 36203109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Weksler B; Sharma P; Moudgill N; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 21899652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Chyle Leak Following Radical En Bloc Esophagectomy with Two-Field Nodal Dissection: Predisposing Factors, Management, and Outcomes.
Milito P; Chmelo J; Dunn L; Kamarajah SK; Madhavan A; Wahed S; Immanuel A; Griffin SM; Phillips AW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 28(7):3963-3972. PubMed ID: 33263829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A structured training pathway to implement robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: the learning curve results from a high-volume center.
Kingma BF; Hadzijusufovic E; Van der Sluis PC; Bano E; Lang H; Ruurda JP; Hillegersberg van R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(Supplement_2):. PubMed ID: 33241300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Chao YK; Hsieh MJ; Liu YH; Liu HP
World J Surg; 2018 Feb; 42(2):590-598. PubMed ID: 28801820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
Osaka Y; Tachibana S; Ota Y; Suda T; Makuuti Y; Watanabe T; Iwasaki K; Katsumata K; Tsuchida A
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Apr; 66(4):225-231. PubMed ID: 29397486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Compare with Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Lung Lobectomy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Hu X; Wang M
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2019; 22(3):169-178. PubMed ID: 30973106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus.
Fernando HC; Luketich JD; Buenaventura PO; Perry Y; Christie NA
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2002 Jul; 22(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12103364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages?
Lee BE; Korst RJ; Kletsman E; Rutledge JR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):724-9. PubMed ID: 24252937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Do alterations in plasma albumin and prealbumin after minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma influence the incidence of cervical anastomotic leak?
Wang YJ; Liu XH; Mei LY; Li KK; Jiang YG; Guo W
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3943-9. PubMed ID: 26694179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with decreased postoperative complications after esophagectomy.
Dyas AR; Stuart CM; Bronsert MR; Schulick RD; McCarter MD; Meguid RA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Jul; 166(1):268-278. PubMed ID: 36577613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Credentialing for robotic lobectomy: what is the learning curve? A retrospective analysis of 272 consecutive cases by a single surgeon.
Baldonado JJAR; Amaral M; Garrett J; Moodie C; Robinson L; Keenan R; Toloza EM; Fontaine JP
J Robot Surg; 2019 Oct; 13(5):663-669. PubMed ID: 30560496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
