178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33660461)
1. Additional Value of Integrated
Yoo J; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Joo I; Lee DH
Korean J Radiol; 2021 May; 22(5):714-724. PubMed ID: 33660461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT.
Kawanaka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Mouri M; Doi H; Oshima T; Niwa H; Kaibe N; Sasako M; Tomita T; Miwa H; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):989-95. PubMed ID: 27130061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Post-neoadjuvant treatment pancreatic cancer resectability and outcome prediction using CT,
Yoo J; Lee JM; Joo I; Lee DH; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Jang JY; Lee SH
Cancer Imaging; 2023 May; 23(1):49. PubMed ID: 37217958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT.
Suenaga Y; Kitajima K; Ishihara T; Sasaki R; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Minamikawa T; Kiyota N; Sugimura K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 26188656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of contrast enhanced CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in suspicious recurrence of biliary tract cancer after curative resection.
Lee YG; Han SW; Oh DY; Chie EK; Jang JY; Im SA; Kim TY; Kim SW; Ha SW; Bang YJ
BMC Cancer; 2011 May; 11():188. PubMed ID: 21599995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of (18) F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in oral cavity cancer patients following surgical reconstruction.
Müller J; Hüllner M; Strobel K; Huber GF; Burger IA; Haerle SK
Laryngoscope; 2015 Aug; 125(8):1861-8. PubMed ID: 25892275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer with FDG PET/MR Imaging versus FDG PET/CT Plus Contrast-enhanced Multidetector CT: A Prospective Preliminary Study.
Joo I; Lee JM; Lee DH; Lee ES; Paeng JC; Lee SJ; Jang JY; Kim SW; Ryu JK; Lee KB
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):149-159. PubMed ID: 27556273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison Between Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Resectability Assessment in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Yoo J; Lee JM; Kang HJ; Bae JS; Jeon SK; Yoon JH
Korean J Radiol; 2023 Oct; 24(10):983-995. PubMed ID: 37793669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Added value of [
Yoon I; Bae JS; Yoo J; Lee DH; Kim SH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7834-7844. PubMed ID: 33768290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic value of
Tsuyoshi H; Tsujikawa T; Yamada S; Okazawa H; Yoshida Y
Cancer Imaging; 2020 Oct; 20(1):75. PubMed ID: 33092631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases.
Seo HJ; Kim MJ; Lee JD; Chung WS; Kim YE
Invest Radiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):548-55. PubMed ID: 21577131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
Kauhanen SP; Komar G; Seppänen MP; Dean KI; Minn HR; Kajander SA; Rinta-Kiikka I; Alanen K; Borra RJ; Puolakkainen PA; Nuutila P; Ovaska JT
Ann Surg; 2009 Dec; 250(6):957-63. PubMed ID: 19687736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of distant metastases in rectal cancer: contrast-enhanced CT vs whole body MRI.
Yoon JH; Yu MH; Hur BY; Park CM; Lee JM
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):104-111. PubMed ID: 32789755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A two-way comparison of whole-body 18FDG PET-CT and whole-body contrast-enhanced MRI for distant metastasis staging in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies.
Li J; Zhou H; Zhang X; Song F; Pang X; Wei Z
Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Mar; 9(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 32233618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/MRI and MDCT for the assessment of preoperative staging and resectability of gastric cancer.
Lee DH; Kim SH; Joo I; Hur BY; Han JK
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1085-91. PubMed ID: 27161056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical value of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE-PET/CT compared to stand-alone contrast enhanced CT for the detection of extra-hepatic metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET).
Albanus DR; Apitzsch J; Erdem Z; Erdem O; Verburg FA; Behrendt FF; Mottaghy FM; Heinzel A
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1866-72. PubMed ID: 26152870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced CT and [
Wagner F; Hakami YA; Warnock G; Fischer G; Huellner MW; Veit-Haibach P
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Oct; 19(5):795-803. PubMed ID: 28224325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: comparison with ¹⁸F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI.
Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Kanda T; Maeda T; Takahashi S; Ebina Y; Miyahara Y; Yamada H; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1672-6. PubMed ID: 23727380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-fluorodexyglucose positron emission tomography combined with contrast enhanced computed tomography in colorectal cancer liver metastasis].
Zhang Z; Lyu Q; Chen F; Liao S; Zhang J; Hu R; Hu P
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 18(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 25809326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of fusion of PET and MRI in the detection of intra-pelvic recurrence of gynecological tumor: comparison with 18F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and pelvic MRI.
Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Kanda T; Maeda T; Makihara N; Ebina Y; Yamada H; Takahashi S; Sugimura K
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 28(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 24129541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
