These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33662753)

  • 1. Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania.
    Kalinauskas M; Mikša K; Inácio M; Gomes E; Pereira P
    J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 286():112239. PubMed ID: 33662753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mapping and assessing coastal recreation cultural ecosystem services supply, flow, and demand in Lithuania.
    Inácio M; Gomes E; Bogdzevič K; Kalinauskas M; Zhao W; Pereira P
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Dec; 323():116175. PubMed ID: 36088764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mapping and assessment of recreational cultural ecosystem services supply and demand in Vilnius (Lithuania).
    Kalinauskas M; Bogdzevič K; Gomes E; Inácio M; Barcelo D; Zhao W; Pereira P
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 855():158590. PubMed ID: 36165823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mapping and assessing natural soundscape quality: An indicator-based model for landscape planning.
    Chen Z; Hermes J; von Haaren C
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Mar; 354():120422. PubMed ID: 38382428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services.
    Ridding LE; Redhead JW; Oliver TH; Schmucki R; McGinlay J; Graves AR; Morris J; Bradbury RB; King H; Bullock JM
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():1145-1154. PubMed ID: 30029348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling aesthetics to support an ecosystem services approach for natural resource management decision making.
    Booth PN; Law SA; Ma J; Buonagurio J; Boyd J; Turnley J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Sep; 13(5):926-938. PubMed ID: 28418204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): A case study of Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai, China].
    Peng WT; Liu WQ; Cai WB; Wang X; Huang Z; Wu CZ
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Feb; 30(2):439-448. PubMed ID: 30915794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping wild seafood potential, supply, flow and demand in Lithuania.
    Inácio M; Mikša K; Kalinauskas M; Pereira P
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 718():137356. PubMed ID: 32109814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping and assessment of future changes in the coastal and marine ecosystem services supply in Lithuania.
    Inácio M; Karnauskaitė D; Gomes E; Barceló D; Pereira P
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 812():152586. PubMed ID: 34954181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating the aesthetic value of landscapes and biological diversity.
    Tribot AS; Deter J; Mouquet N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1886):. PubMed ID: 30185647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services for landscape corridor planning: A case study of the Silk Roads corridor in Zhangye, China.
    Xu H; Zhao G; Fagerholm N; Primdahl J; Plieninger T
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 264():110458. PubMed ID: 32250892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Spatial evaluation on ecological and aesthetic quality of Beijing agricultural landscape].
    Pan Y; Xiao H; Yu ZR
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2009 Oct; 20(10):2455-60. PubMed ID: 20077704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of Priority Conservation Areas for Natural Heritage Sites Integrating Landscape Ecological Risks and Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in the Bogda, China.
    Wang T; Chen X; Zheng X; Lu Y; Han F; Yang Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the relationships between agroecosystem condition and the ecosystem service soil erosion regulation in Northern Germany.
    Rendon P; Steinhoff-Knopp B; Saggau P; Burkhard B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0234288. PubMed ID: 33284810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping legal authority for terrestrial conservation corridors along streams.
    Stahl AT; Fremier AK; Cosens BA
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Aug; 34(4):943-955. PubMed ID: 32056252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A framework to assess landscape structural capacity to provide regulating ecosystem services in West Africa.
    Inkoom JN; Frank S; Greve K; Fürst C
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Mar; 209():393-408. PubMed ID: 29309964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National assessment of cultural ecosystem services: Participatory mapping in Switzerland.
    Jaligot R; Hasler S; Chenal J
    Ambio; 2019 Oct; 48(10):1219-1233. PubMed ID: 30612314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting cultural ecosystem services use in Vilnius (Lithuania): A participatory mapping survey approach.
    Pinto LV; Inácio M; Bogdzevič K; Kalinauskas M; Gomes E; Pereira P
    Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e15384. PubMed ID: 37101641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
    Hijjeh M; Al Shaikh L; Alinier G; Selwood D; Malmstrom F; Hassan IF
    Qatar Med J; 2019; 2019(2):2. PubMed ID: 31763205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.