BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

759 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33663020)

  • 1. Producing wood at least cost to biodiversity: integrating Triad and sharing-sparing approaches to inform forest landscape management.
    Betts MG; Phalan BT; Wolf C; Baker SC; Messier C; Puettmann KJ; Green R; Harris SH; Edwards DP; Lindenmayer DB; Balmford A
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Aug; 96(4):1301-1317. PubMed ID: 33663020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to reconcile wood production and biodiversity conservation? The Pan-European boreal forest history gradient as an "experiment".
    Naumov V; Manton M; Elbakidze M; Rendenieks Z; Priednieks J; Uhlianets S; Yamelynets T; Zhivotov A; Angelstam P
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 218():1-13. PubMed ID: 29660541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transitional forestry in New Zealand: re-evaluating the design and management of forest systems through the lens of forest purpose.
    Jones AG; Cridge A; Fraser S; Holt L; Klinger S; McGregor KF; Paul T; Payn T; Scott MB; Yao RT; Dickinson Y
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2023 Aug; 98(4):1003-1015. PubMed ID: 36808687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can nature conservation and wood production be reconciled in managed forests? A review of driving factors for integrated forest management in Europe.
    Aggestam F; Konczal A; Sotirov M; Wallin I; Paillet Y; Spinelli R; Lindner M; Derks J; Hanewinkel M; Winkel G
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Aug; 268():110670. PubMed ID: 32510432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing multifunctionality in European boreal forests: The potential role of Triad landscape functional zoning.
    Blattert C; Eyvindson K; Mönkkönen M; Raatikainen KJ; Triviño M; Duflot R
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 348():119250. PubMed ID: 37864945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sharing land via keystone structure: Retaining naturally regenerated trees may efficiently benefit birds in plantations.
    Yamaura Y; Unno A; Royle JA
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Apr; 33(3):e2802. PubMed ID: 36550637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial trade-offs between ecological and economical sustainability in the boreal production forest.
    Mazziotta A; Borges P; Kangas A; Halme P; Eyvindson K
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 330():117144. PubMed ID: 36586374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.
    Niesten E; Frumhoff PC; Manion M; Hardner JJ
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1875-88. PubMed ID: 12460503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trade-offs between forest protection and wood supply in Europe.
    Verkerk PJ; Zanchi G; Lindner M
    Environ Manage; 2014 Jun; 53(6):1085-94. PubMed ID: 24699992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increase in dead wood, large living trees and tree diversity, yet decrease in understory vegetation cover: The effect of three decades of biodiversity-oriented forest policy in Swedish forests.
    Kyaschenko J; Strengbom J; Felton A; Aakala T; Staland H; Ranius T
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 313():114993. PubMed ID: 35413650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keeping pace with forestry: Multi-scale conservation in a changing production forest matrix.
    Felton A; Löfroth T; Angelstam P; Gustafsson L; Hjältén J; Felton AM; Simonsson P; Dahlberg A; Lindbladh M; Svensson J; Nilsson U; Lodin I; Hedwall PO; Sténs A; Lämås T; Brunet J; Kalén C; Kriström B; Gemmel P; Ranius T
    Ambio; 2020 May; 49(5):1050-1064. PubMed ID: 31529355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Navigating the complexities of the forest land sharing
    Pichancourt JB
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16809. PubMed ID: 38304187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using the Viability Theory to Assess the Flexibility of Forest Managers Under Ecological Intensification.
    Mathias JD; Bonté B; Cordonnier T; de Morogues F
    Environ Manage; 2015 Nov; 56(5):1170-83. PubMed ID: 26093825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective‐logging and oil palm: multitaxon impacts, biodiversity indicators, and trade‐offs for conservation planning.
    Edwards DP; Magrach A; Woodcock P; Ji Y; Lim NT-; Edwards FA; Larsen TH; Hsu WW; Benedick S; Khen CV; Chung AYC; Reynolds G; Fisher B; Laurance WF; Wilcove DS; Hamer KC; Yu DW
    Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(8):2029-49. PubMed ID: 29185670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sparing land for secondary forest regeneration protects more tropical biodiversity than land sharing in cattle farming landscapes.
    Edwards FA; Massam MR; Cosset CCP; Cannon PG; Haugaasen T; Gilroy JJ; Edwards DP
    Curr Biol; 2021 Mar; 31(6):1284-1293.e4. PubMed ID: 33482111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natural disturbance regimes as a guide for sustainable forest management in Europe.
    Aszalós R; Thom D; Aakala T; Angelstam P; Brūmelis G; Gálhidy L; Gratzer G; Hlásny T; Katzensteiner K; Kovács B; Knoke T; Larrieu L; Motta R; Müller J; Ódor P; Roženbergar D; Paillet Y; Pitar D; Standovár T; Svoboda M; Szwagrzyk J; Toscani P; Keeton WS
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2596. PubMed ID: 35340078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Land-sparing benefits biodiversity while land-sharing benefits ecosystem services": Stakeholders' perspectives on biodiversity conservation strategies in boreal forests.
    Löfroth T; Merinero S; Johansson J; Nordström EM; Sahlström E; Sjögren J; Ranius T
    Ambio; 2024 Jan; 53(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 37819440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards sustainable forestry: Using a spatial Bayesian belief network to quantify trade-offs among forest-related ecosystem services.
    Frizzle C; Fournier RA; Trudel M; Luther JE
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 301():113817. PubMed ID: 34607136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative contributions of set-asides and tree retention to the long-term availability of key forest biodiversity structures at the landscape scale.
    Roberge JM; Lämås T; Lundmark T; Ranius T; Felton A; Nordin A
    J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():284-92. PubMed ID: 25745845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatially dynamic forest management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns.
    Mönkkönen M; Juutinen A; Mazziotta A; Miettinen K; Podkopaev D; Reunanen P; Salminen H; Tikkanen OP
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Feb; 134():80-9. PubMed ID: 24463852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.