183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33665275)
21. Two-Year Survivorship and Outcomes of a Three-Dimensional Printed Metaphyseal Cone in the Setting of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Monárrez R; Bains SS; Chen Z; Sax OC; Salib CG; Mont MA; Delanois RE
J Knee Surg; 2022 Dec; 35(14):1540-1543. PubMed ID: 36538941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Shichman I; Oakley C; Willems JH; van Hellemondt GG; Heesterbeek P; Rozell J; Marwin S; Schwarzkopf R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar; 143(3):1537-1547. PubMed ID: 36243781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Outcomes of Metaphyseal Cones and Stem Fixation Following Rotating Hinge in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Lizcano JD; Goh GS; Kohli M; Deirmengian GK; Arsoy D; Courtney PM
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38360286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiographic Cone Zone Classification of Metaphyseal Cone Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Behery OA; Shing EZ; Yu Z; Springer BD; Beaver WB; Fehring TK; Otero JE
Arthroplast Today; 2024 Feb; 25():101271. PubMed ID: 38304246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Varus-Valgus Constrained Implants in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mean Clinical Follow-Up of Six Years.
Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Wellman SS; Jiranek WA; Seyler TM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7S):S303-S307. PubMed ID: 33558046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intermediate-Term Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Small I; Meghpara M; Stein J; Goh GS; Banerjee S; Courtney PM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Sep; 37(9):1839-1843. PubMed ID: 35398228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Neuropathic (Charcot) Arthropathy: Contemporary Results.
Tibbo ME; Chalmers BP; Berry DJ; Pagnano MW; Lewallen DG; Abdel MP
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):2815-2820. PubMed ID: 29706257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contemporary Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 50 Years: 1 in 3 Risk of Re-Revision by 10 Years.
Chalmers BP; Pallante GD; Sierra RJ; Lewallen DG; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S266-S270. PubMed ID: 30824295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliable outcomes and survivorship of primary total knee arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the knee.
Chalmers BP; Mehrotra KG; Sierra RJ; Pagnano MW; Taunton MJ; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2019 Nov; 101-B(11):1356-1361. PubMed ID: 31674235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of tantalum cones and diaphyseal-engaging stems in tibial component revision: a consecutive series.
Spinello P; Thiele RAR; Zepeda K; Giori N; Indelli PF
Knee Surg Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 34(1):12. PubMed ID: 35272710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-Term Results After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Prostheses.
Cottino U; Abdel MP; Perry KI; Mara KC; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Feb; 99(4):324-330. PubMed ID: 28196034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Aseptic Loosening of Porous Metaphyseal Sleeves and Tantalum Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Roach RP; Clair AJ; Behery OA; Thakkar SC; Iorio R; Deshmukh AJ
J Knee Surg; 2021 Aug; 34(10):1033-1041. PubMed ID: 32074656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?
Lachiewicz PF; Bolognesi MP; Henderson RA; Soileau ES; Vail TP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jan; 470(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 21465329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Remily EA; Dávila Castrodad IM; Mohamed NS; Wilkie WA; Kelemen MN; Delanois RE
Orthopedics; 2021 Jan; 44(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 33284980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Medium term clinical outcomes of tibial cones in revision knee arthroplasty.
Erivan R; Tracey R; Mulliez A; Villatte G; Paprosky W
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2021 Jan; 141(1):113-118. PubMed ID: 33037885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
