130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33667936)
1. Evaluation of image quality and patient exposure in fluoroscopy using a phantom: Is there any clinical relevance?
Tsalafoutas IA; Tsapaki V; Triantopoulou I
Eur J Radiol; 2021 May; 138():109607. PubMed ID: 33667936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation dose reduction and static image quality assessment using a channelized hotelling observer on an angiography system upgraded with clarity IQ.
Ortenzia O; Trojani V; Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Iori M; Ghetti C
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Feb; 6(2):025008. PubMed ID: 33438634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital radiography image quality evaluation using various phantoms and software.
Tsalafoutas IA; AlKhazzam S; Tsapaki V; AlNaemi H; Kharita MH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13823. PubMed ID: 36345212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Phantom Study and a Retrospective Clinical Analysis to Investigate the Impact of a New Image Processing Technology on Radiation Dose and Image Quality during Hepatic Embolization.
Dave JK; Eschelman DJ; Wasserman JR; Gonsalves CF; Gingold EL
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 26948994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a contrast-to-noise ratio-driven exposure control and a regular detector dose-driven exposure control in abdominal imaging in a clinical angiography system.
Werncke T; Kemling M; Tashenov S; Hinrichs JB; Meine TC; Maschke SK; Kyriakou Y; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7641-7656. PubMed ID: 34651705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biplane interventional pediatric system with cone-beam CT: dose and image quality characterization for the default protocols.
Corredoira E; Vañó E; Alejo L; Ubeda C; Gutiérrez-Larraya F; Garayoa J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):357-376. PubMed ID: 27455474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tantalum-specific contrast-to-noise ratio or conventional detector dose-driven exposure control in angiography: radiation dose and image quality evaluation in a porcine model.
Werncke T; Meine TC; Hinrichs JB; Maschke SK; Becker LS; Brüsch I; Rumpel R; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
Eur Radiol Exp; 2022 May; 6(1):24. PubMed ID: 35578057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A real-time regional adaptive exposure method for saving dose-area product in x-ray fluoroscopy.
Burion S; Speidel MA; Funk T
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051911. PubMed ID: 23635281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.
Smet MH; Breysem L; Mussen E; Bosmans H; Marshall NW; Cockmartin L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 29460076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of a contrast-to-noise ratio driven and material specific exposure control on image quality and radiation exposure in angiography.
Werncke T; Kemling M; Tashenov S; Hinrichs JB; Meine TC; Maschke SK; Kyriakou Y; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065020. PubMed ID: 33709957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New image-processing and noise-reduction software reduces radiation dose during complex endovascular procedures.
Kirkwood ML; Guild JB; Arbique GM; Tsai S; Modrall JG; Anderson JA; Rectenwald J; Timaran C
J Vasc Surg; 2016 Nov; 64(5):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 27471175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT automated exposure control using a generalized detectability index.
Khobragade P; Rupcich F; Fan J; Crotty DJ; Kulkarni NM; O'Connor SD; Foley WD; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):140-151. PubMed ID: 30417403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic image quality evaluation in digital radiography using for-processing and for-presentation images.
Tsalafoutas IA; AlKhazzam S; Tsapaki V; Kharita MH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 25(4):e14285. PubMed ID: 38317593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strategies for radiation exposure-sparing in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures.
Fiorilli PN; Kobayashi T; Giri J; Hirshfeld JW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 95(1):118-127. PubMed ID: 30980483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR.
Inaba Y; Chida K; Kobayashi R; Zuguchi M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 27455503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy.
Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M; Dance DR
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):537-59. PubMed ID: 10070800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality assessment using the CD-DISC phantom for vascular radiology and vascular surgery.
Struelens L; Hambach L; Buls N; Smans K; Malchair F; Hoornaert MT; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Aug; 67(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 17826937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of optimized ultralow-dose pulsed fluoroscopy for upper gastrointestinal tract examinations: a phantom study with clinical correlation.
Weiss J; Pomschar A; Rist C; Neumaier K; Li M; Flatz W; Thierfelder K; Notohamiprodjo M
Radiol Med; 2017 Nov; 122(11):822-828. PubMed ID: 28733918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Absorbed dose and image quality in examinations of the colon with digital and analogue techniques.
Persliden J; Larsson P; Norén B; Wirell S
Acta Radiol; 1997 Nov; 38(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 9394659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
