130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33667936)
21. OPTIMISATION OF PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM-BASED EVALUATION.
Hadjiconstanti AC; Messaris GAT; Thomopoulos KC; Solomou AG; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jun; 175(1):118-123. PubMed ID: 27664432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
Geijer H
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Reduction of radiation exposure and image quality using dose reduction tool on computed tomography fluoroscopy].
Sakabe D; Funama Y; Murazaki H; Tochihara S; Ono M; Tokuda M; Kai N; Nakato K; Hashida M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(8):970-8. PubMed ID: 22975695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimisation of imaging protocols in interventional cardiology: impact on patient doses.
Ordiales JM; Vano E; Nogales JM; Ramos J; López-Mínguez JR; Martínez G; Cerrato P; Álvarez FJ
J Radiol Prot; 2017 Sep; 37(3):684-696. PubMed ID: 28677594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A multihospital survey of radiation exposure and image quality in pediatric fluoroscopy.
Brown PH; Silberberg PJ; Thomas RD; Strife JL; Towbin RB
Pediatr Radiol; 2000 Apr; 30(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 10789901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characteristics of a New X-Ray Imaging System for Interventional Procedures: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose.
Schernthaner RE; Haroun RR; Nguyen S; Duran R; Sohn JH; Sahu S; Chapiro J; Zhao Y; Radaelli A; van der Bom IM; Mauti M; Hong K; Geschwind JH; Lin M
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Mar; 41(3):502-508. PubMed ID: 29090348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.
Nakamura S; Kobayashi T; Funatsu A; Okada T; Mauti M; Waizumi Y; Yamada S
Heart Vessels; 2016 May; 31(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 25840815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Direct Effective Dose Calculations in Pediatric Fluoroscopy-Guided Abdominal Interventions with Rando-Alderson Phantoms - Optimization of Preset Parameter Settings.
Wildgruber M; Müller-Wille R; Goessmann H; Uller W; Wohlgemuth WA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161806. PubMed ID: 27556584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Harmonisation of imaging protocols, radiation doses and image quality in gastrointestinal fluoroscopy examinations - multicentre study.
Forbes A; Geryes BH; Hornbeck A; Kien N; Quelquejay C; Adamsbaum C; Farah J; le Pointe HD
Pediatr Radiol; 2022 Jan; 52(1):50-57. PubMed ID: 34657168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A novel method for comparing radiation dose and image quality, between and within different x-ray units in a series of hospitals.
Al-Murshedi S; Hogg P; Lanca L; England A
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1344-1358. PubMed ID: 30251707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Variability in radiation dose and image quality: A comparison across fluoroscopy-system vendors, generations of equipment and institutions.
Hill KD; Mann SD; Carboni MP; Doyle TP; Idriss SF; Janssen DF; Nicholson GT; Sathanandam S; Fleming GA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):E471-E477. PubMed ID: 30208245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy.
Seibert JA
Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 30585956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Evaluation of Radiation Dose and Image Quality for Angiographic System with Spectral Shaping Filter].
Ichikawa N; Matsubara K; Fukuda A
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 30662028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
Lin PJ
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Performance evaluation of two interventional fluoroscope suites for cardiovascular imaging.
Anthony G; Liang Y; Zhao X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 23(10):e13741. PubMed ID: 35950644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Toward standardized quantitative image quality (IQ) assessment in computed tomography (CT): A comprehensive framework for automated and comparative IQ analysis based on ICRU Report 87.
Pahn G; Skornitzke S; Schlemmer HP; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):104-15. PubMed ID: 26520485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Description and implementation of a quality control program in an imaging-based clinical trial.
Cagnon CH; Cody DD; McNitt-Gray MF; Seibert JA; Judy PF; Aberle DR
Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1431-41. PubMed ID: 17111584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
