170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3367116)
1. Evaluation of the DINAMAP blood pressure monitor in an ambulatory primary care setting.
Ornstein S; Markert G; Litchfield L; Zemp L
J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 3367116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of comparability of two automated blood pressure monitors in a hypertensive population.
Linden W; Wright JM
Clin Invest Med; 1986; 9(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 2873912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with controlled atrial fibrillation.
Stewart MJ; Gough K; Padfield PL
J Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 13(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 7622850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure.
Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of blood pressure instrument and cuff side on blood pressure reading in pregnant women in the lateral recumbent position.
Kinsella SM
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2006 Oct; 15(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 16945515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of the Nippon Colin BP-103N blood pressure monitor.
Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
J Hum Hypertens; 1987 Jun; 1(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 3508193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the accuracy of non-invasive automatic blood pressure monitors.
Kawahara M
Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 2096748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.
Whincup PH; Bruce NG; Cook DG; Shaper AG
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Apr; 46(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 1583434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative study of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitors with standard zero and random zero sphygmomanometers].
Tislér A; Barna I; Châtel R
Orv Hetil; 1994 Jun; 135(26):1415-9. PubMed ID: 8028897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.
Beaubien ER; Card CM; Card SE; Biem HJ; Wilson TW
J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of an automatic sphygmomanometer].
Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
Sb Lek; 1989 Sep; 91(8):274-84. PubMed ID: 2617128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of the characteristics and performance of an automatic sphygmomanometer (Omega 1400)].
Gigli G; Casu M; Paganini G; Colombano M; Campostano A; Merlo F; Lamedica G
Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1991 Mar; 67(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 1930899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol.
de Greeff A; Reggiori F; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 17303988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
