These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33673754)

  • 1. Semi-quantitative scoring of imaging modalities in detecting soft tissue foreign bodies: an in vitro study.
    Alfuraih AM; Almutairi FN; Alotaibi SB; Alshmrani AA
    Acta Radiol; 2022 Apr; 63(4):474-480. PubMed ID: 33673754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study.
    Oikarinen KS; Nieminen TM; Mäkäräinen H; Pyhtinen J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 22(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 8320449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies by plain radiography, xerography, computed tomography, and ultrasonography.
    Ginsburg MJ; Ellis GL; Flom LL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1990 Jun; 19(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 2188542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiology of foreign bodies: how do we image them?
    Ingraham CR; Mannelli L; Robinson JD; Linnau KF
    Emerg Radiol; 2015 Aug; 22(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 25648360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visibility of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region using plain radiography, CT, MRI and ultrasonography: an in vitro study.
    Javadrashid R; Fouladi DF; Golamian M; Hajalioghli P; Daghighi MH; Shahmorady Z; Niknejad MT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140229. PubMed ID: 25426703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound versus radiography in the detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies.
    Manthey DE; Storrow AB; Milbourn JM; Wagner BJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 28(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 8669741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Visibility of Foreign Bodies in the Maxillofacial Region: Comparison of Computed Tomography, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Valizadeh S; Pouraliakbar H; Kiani L; Safi Y; Alibakhshi L
    Iran J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(4):e37265. PubMed ID: 27895878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detectability of foreign body materials using X-ray, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: A phantom study.
    Voss JO; Doll C; Raguse JD; Beck-Broichsitter B; Walter-Rittel T; Kahn J; Böning G; Maier C; Thieme N
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 135():109505. PubMed ID: 33421828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of soft-tissue foreign bodies: comparing conventional plain film radiography, computed radiography printed on film, and computed radiography displayed on a computer workstation.
    Reiner B; Siegel E; McLaurin T; Pomerantz S; Allman R; Hebel JR; Fritz S; Protopapas Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):141-4. PubMed ID: 8659358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of radiological methods for detection of wood foreign body in animal model].
    Venter NG; Jamel N; Marques RG; Djahjah F; Mendonça Lde S
    Acta Cir Bras; 2005; 20 Suppl 1():34-41. PubMed ID: 16186971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography.
    Aras MH; Miloglu O; Barutcugil C; Kantarci M; Ozcan E; Harorli A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 20100917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography for small foreign body detection in the hand in comparison with radiography, MSCT and MRI: an ex vivo study.
    Jandl NM; Rolvien T; Rupp T; Schumacher U; Püschel K; Maas KJ; Amling M; Henes FO; Spink C
    Injury; 2021 Oct; 52(10):2841-2847. PubMed ID: 33487409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visibility of Different Intraorbital Foreign Bodies Using Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.
    Javadrashid R; Golamian M; Shahrzad M; Hajalioghli P; Shahmorady Z; Fouladi DF; Sadrarhami S; Akhoundzadeh L
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2017 May; 68(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 26899378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of foreign bodies in the hand.
    Russell RC; Williamson DA; Sullivan JW; Suchy H; Suliman O
    J Hand Surg Am; 1991 Jan; 16(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1995686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Use of sonography in splinter injuries: a model simulation].
    Dizdari X; Keister G; Zimmer J; Otte A
    Arch Kriminol; 2014; 234(3-4):103-13. PubMed ID: 26548025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-resolution sonography is effective in detection of soft tissue foreign bodies: experience from a rural Indian center.
    Saboo SS; Saboo SH; Soni SS; Adhane V
    J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1245-9. PubMed ID: 19710224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound-guided retrieval of small foreign objects in subcutaneous tissue.
    Turner J; Wilde CH; Hughes KC; Meilstrup JW; Manders EK
    Ann Emerg Med; 1997 Jun; 29(6):731-4. PubMed ID: 9174516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing foreign bodies in the foot.
    Pattamapaspong N; Srisuwan T; Sivasomboon C; Nasuto M; Suwannahoy P; Settakorn J; Kraisarin J; Guglielmi G
    Radiol Med; 2013 Mar; 118(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 22744349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT more accurately detects foreign bodies within the equine foot than MRI or digital radiography.
    Ogden NKE; Milner PI; Stack JD; Talbot AM
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2021 Mar; 62(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 33325609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Demonstration of non-metallic foreign bodies by conventional x-ray techniques and computer tomography. Absorption coefficient of glass, plastic and wood (author's transl)].
    Schmitt WG; Hübener KH
    Rofo; 1981 Aug; 135(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 6212316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.