424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33674284)
1. Evaluation of Specimen Types and Saliva Stabilization Solutions for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.
Griesemer SB; Van Slyke G; Ehrbar D; Strle K; Yildirim T; Centurioni DA; Walsh AC; Chang AK; Waxman MJ; St George K
J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 59(5):. PubMed ID: 33674284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.
Uddin MKM; Shirin T; Hossain ME; Alam AN; Ami JQ; Hasan R; Miah M; Shaly NJ; Ahmed S; Rahman SMM; Rahman M; Banu S
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0046821. PubMed ID: 34730436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lee RA; Herigon JC; Benedetti A; Pollock NR; Denkinger CM
J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 59(5):. PubMed ID: 33504593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.
Sakanashi D; Asai N; Nakamura A; Miyazaki N; Kawamoto Y; Ohno T; Yamada A; Koita I; Suematsu H; Hagihara M; Shiota A; Kurumiya A; Sakata M; Kato S; Muramatsu Y; Koizumi Y; Kishino T; Ohashi W; Yamagishi Y; Mikamo H
J Infect Chemother; 2021 Jan; 27(1):126-129. PubMed ID: 33060046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Saliva as Compared to Nasopharyngeal Swabs in Outpatients.
Kandel C; Zheng J; McCready J; Serbanescu MA; Racher H; Desaulnier M; Powis JE; Vojdani K; Finlay L; Sheldrake E; Vermeiren C; Katz K; McGeer A; Kozak R; Goneau LW
Viruses; 2020 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 33212817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.
Fan G; Qin X; Streblow DN; Hoyos CM; Hansel DE
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0006221. PubMed ID: 34431689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of saliva with healthcare workers- and patient-collected swabs in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in a large cohort.
Sasikala M; Sadhana Y; Vijayasarathy K; Gupta A; Daram SK; Podduturi NCR; Reddy DN
BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Jul; 21(1):648. PubMed ID: 34225656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Sample Pooling for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal Swab and Saliva Samples with the Idylla SARS-CoV-2 Test.
Hofman P; Allegra M; Salah M; Benzaquen J; Tanga V; Bordone O; Fayada J; Long-Mira E; Lassalle S; Lanteri E; Lespinet-Fabre V; Brest P; Mograbi B; Maniel C; Boutros J; Leroy S; Heeke S; Hofman V; Marquette CH; Ilié M
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0099621. PubMed ID: 34756076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Saliva Is a Promising Alternative Specimen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Children and Adults.
Yee R; Truong TT; Pannaraj PS; Eubanks N; Gai E; Jumarang J; Turner L; Peralta A; Lee Y; Dien Bard J
J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 59(2):. PubMed ID: 33239380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of simple nucleic acid extraction methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal and saliva specimens during global shortage of extraction kits.
Chu AW; Chan WM; Ip JD; Yip CC; Chan JF; Yuen KY; To KK
J Clin Virol; 2020 Aug; 129():104519. PubMed ID: 32629187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Self-Collected Anterior Nasal and Saliva Specimens versus Health Care Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Hanson KE; Barker AP; Hillyard DR; Gilmore N; Barrett JW; Orlandi RR; Shakir SM
J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Oct; 58(11):. PubMed ID: 32817233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy of healthcare worker versus self collected (2-in-1) Oropharyngeal and Bilateral Mid-Turbinate (OPMT) swabs and saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2.
Tan SY; Tey HL; Lim ETH; Toh ST; Chan YH; Tan PT; Lee SA; Tan CX; Koh GCH; Tan TY; Siau C
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244417. PubMed ID: 33326503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are Posterior Oropharyngeal Saliva Specimens an Acceptable Alternative to Nasopharyngeal Sampling for the Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in Primary-Care Settings?
Masse S; Bonnet C; Vilcu AM; Benamar H; Swital M; van der Werf S; Carrat F; Hanslik T; Blanchon T; Falchi A
Viruses; 2021 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 33926069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal specimens.
Todsen T; Tolsgaard M; Folke F; Jakobsen KK; Ersbøll AK; Benfield T; von Buchwald C; Kirkby N
Dan Med J; 2021 Apr; 68(5):. PubMed ID: 33832565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the use of posterior oropharyngeal saliva in a point-of-care assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Chen JH; Yip CC; Poon RW; Chan KH; Cheng VC; Hung IF; Chan JF; Yuen KY; To KK
Emerg Microbes Infect; 2020 Dec; 9(1):1356-1359. PubMed ID: 32459137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adding saliva testing to oropharyngeal and deep nasal swab testing increases PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in primary care and children.
Oliver J; Tosif S; Lee LY; Costa AM; Bartel C; Last K; Clifford V; Daley A; Allard N; Orr C; Nind A; Alexander K; Meagher N; Sait M; Ballard SA; Williams E; Bond K; Williamson DA; Crawford NW; Gibney KB
Med J Aust; 2021 Sep; 215(6):273-278. PubMed ID: 34287935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Gargle, Spit, and Sputum Specimens.
Poukka E; Mäkelä H; Hagberg L; Vo T; Nohynek H; Ikonen N; Liitsola K; Helve O; Savolainen-Kopra C; Dub T
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0003521. PubMed ID: 34431686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Saliva as a testing specimen with or without pooling for SARS-CoV-2 detection by multiplex RT-PCR test.
Sun Q; Li J; Ren H; Pastor L; Loginova Y; Madej R; Taylor K; Wong JK; Zhang Z; Zhang A; Lu CM; Sha MY
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0243183. PubMed ID: 33621263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of RNA Extraction-Free Method for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Salivary Samples for Mass Screening for COVID-19.
Mahmoud SA; Ganesan S; Ibrahim E; Thakre B; Teddy JG; Raheja P; Abbas WZ
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():5568350. PubMed ID: 34327228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Sensitivity and Costs of Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Infection With Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swabs : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Bastos ML; Perlman-Arrow S; Menzies D; Campbell JR
Ann Intern Med; 2021 Apr; 174(4):501-510. PubMed ID: 33428446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
