197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33674891)
41. Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Kramer GM; Frings V; Hoetjes N; Hoekstra OS; Smit EF; de Langen AJ; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1343-9. PubMed ID: 27103020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prognostic value comparison between (18)F-FLT PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT volume-based metabolic parameters in patients with head and neck cancer.
Hoshikawa H; Mori T; Yamamoto Y; Kishino T; Fukumura T; Samukawa Y; Mori N; Nishiyama Y
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 40(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 25546204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Incremental Value of Cocktail 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT Over 18F-FDG PET/CT Alone for Characterization of Skeletal Metastases in Breast Cancer.
Roop MJ; Singh B; Singh H; Watts A; Kohli PS; Mittal BR; Singh G
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):335-340. PubMed ID: 28263210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Correlation between
Zhao J; Wang H
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2021 Apr; 65(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 33538120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Fully automated analysis for bone scintigraphy with artificial neural network: usefulness of bone scan index (BSI) in breast cancer.
Inaki A; Nakajima K; Wakabayashi H; Mochizuki T; Kinuya S
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):755-765. PubMed ID: 31317398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The Volume-metabolic Combined Parameters from (18)F-FDG PET/CT May Help Predict the Outcomes of Cervical Carcinoma.
Sun Y; Lu P; Yu L
Acad Radiol; 2016 May; 23(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 26853968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Breast cancer staging in a single session: whole-body PET/CT mammography.
Heusner TA; Kuemmel S; Umutlu L; Koeninger A; Freudenberg LS; Hauth EA; Kimmig KR; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
J Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 49(8):1215-22. PubMed ID: 18632831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Value of (18)F-FDG PET-CT imaging to predict epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma].
Zhao CY; Deng XY; Wang HS; Cao GP; Ding JN; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 43(7):795-800. PubMed ID: 34289575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49.
Mi L; Zhao Y; Zhao X; Yin F; Yin X; Li N; Shi J; Han X; Duan X; Zhao M; Han G; Wang J
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2021 Oct; 36(8):662-671. PubMed ID: 32783634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50.
Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Shinaji T; Tani A; Nakabeppu Y; Nakajo M; Nakajo A; Natsugoe S; Yoshiura T
Br J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 92(1094):20180620. PubMed ID: 30273012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in salivary gland carcinomas.
Ryu IS; Kim JS; Roh JL; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1032-8. PubMed ID: 23670902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumor recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma: a comparison to conventional imaging.
Gallowitsch HJ; Kresnik E; Gasser J; Kumnig G; Igerc I; Mikosch P; Lind P
Invest Radiol; 2003 May; 38(5):250-6. PubMed ID: 12750613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Texture analysis of
Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Nakabeppu Y; Nakajo M; Higashi R; Fukukura Y; Sasaki K; Uchikado Y; Natsugoe S; Yoshiura T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Feb; 44(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 27613542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54.
Mantziari S; Pomoni A; Prior JO; Winiker M; Allemann P; Demartines N; Schäfer M
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31969127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Harmonized pretreatment quantitative volume-based
Kitajima K; Miyoshi Y; Sekine T; Takei H; Ito K; Suto A; Kaida H; Daisaki H; Yamakado K
Hell J Nucl Med; 2020; 23(3):272-289. PubMed ID: 33367302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Prognostic value of quantitative fluorodeoxyglucose measurements in newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer.
Ulaner GA; Eaton A; Morris PG; Lilienstein J; Jhaveri K; Patil S; Fazio M; Larson S; Hudis CA; Jochelson MS
Cancer Med; 2013 Oct; 2(5):725-33. PubMed ID: 24403238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Diagnostic accuracy of virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy for the detection of lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Herbrik M; Treffert J; Geiger B; Riegger C; Hartung V; Rosenbaum-Krumme SJ; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
J Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 52(10):1520-5. PubMed ID: 21908390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Diagnostic performance of
Chaput A; Robin P; Podeur F; Ollivier M; Keromnes N; Tissot V; Nonent M; Salaün PY; Rousset J; Abgral R
Laryngoscope; 2018 Feb; 128(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 28600822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume of pretreatment
Kumasaka S; Nakajima T; Arisaka Y; Tokue A; Achmad A; Fukushima Y; Shimizu K; Kaira K; Higuchi T; Tsushima Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2018 Nov; 18(1):46. PubMed ID: 30477476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Predictive Value of Metabolic Parameters Derived From
Liu H; Ye Z; Yang T; Xie H; Duan T; Li M; Wu M; Song B
Front Immunol; 2021; 12():724464. PubMed ID: 34512653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
