BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33675168)

  • 1. Comparison of Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem and the Conventional Standard Corail Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Guo J; Tan J; Peng L; Song Q; Kong HR; Wang P; Shen HY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 May; 13(3):749-757. PubMed ID: 33675168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem Versus Conventional Corail Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Short-Term, Retrospective, Comparative Study.
    Chu K; Wang Y; Yang M; Wei C; Huo J; Yao M; Li Z; Li H
    Med Sci Monit; 2023 Apr; 29():e939635. PubMed ID: 37062914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and radiological results of high offset tri-lock bone preservation stem in unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 3 years.
    Peng L; Ma J; Zeng Y; Wu Y; Si H; Shen B
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 16(1):635. PubMed ID: 34689823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Femoral Bone Mineral Density Changes around 3 Common Designs of Cementless Stems after Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Liu Y; Wei WX; Zeng Y; Ma J; Yang J; Shen B
    Orthop Surg; 2022 Jun; 14(6):1059-1070. PubMed ID: 35466536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term clinical and radiological results of two different design metaphyseal fitting femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Tatani I; Solou K; Panagopoulos A; Lakoumentas J; Kouzelis A; Megas P
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 May; 16(1):316. PubMed ID: 34001204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term results and bone remodeling after THA with a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kang JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Mar; 472(3):943-50. PubMed ID: 24163094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midterm Comparative Analysis of Short Femoral Stem Survivorship in Dorr Type A Femurs.
    Hong SH; Han SB
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2024 Apr; 16(2):201-209. PubMed ID: 38562642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Greater increase in femoral offset with use of collum femoris-preserving stem than Tri-Lock stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Yao M; Wang Y; Wei C; Han Y; Li H
    J Int Med Res; 2020 May; 48(5):300060520925999. PubMed ID: 32459103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two- to 4-Year Followup of a Short Stem THA Construct: Excellent Fixation, Thigh Pain a Concern.
    Amendola RL; Goetz DD; Liu SS; Callaghan JJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):375-383. PubMed ID: 27417852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Sep; 474(9):2008-17. PubMed ID: 27260482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of long monoblock, hydroxyapatite-coated stem in revision hip arthroplasty with extended trochanteric osteotomy: a multicenter study.
    Xin P; Yang J; Chen G; Wang Y; Wang Y; Zhang G
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):20. PubMed ID: 38167438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical effect of Corail femoral prosthesis with different offset in total hip arthroplasty].
    Li P; Xiong CJ; Du YQ; Dong Y; Gao ZS; Li TJ; Zhou YG
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2022 Nov; 35(11):1074-80. PubMed ID: 36415195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term survivorship of the Corailâ„¢ standard stem.
    Louboutin L; Viste A; Desmarchelier R; Fessy MH
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 103(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 28778624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application of bone-retaining femoral stem prosthesis in young patients with Dorr C femoral medullary cavity].
    Liu J; Qu T; Li XS; Jia BL; Zhen P; Li YJ; Tian Q; Wang W; He XL
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Sep; 32(9):785-791. PubMed ID: 31615171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Promising medium-term results of anterior approach with an anatomical short stem in primary hip arthroplasty.
    Rivera F; Bardelli A; Giolitti A
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2021 Mar; 22(1):8. PubMed ID: 33675436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of the Corail stem for revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of clinical outcomes and cost.
    Wood TJ; Alzahrani M; Marsh `D; Somerville LE; Vasarhelyi EM; Lanting BA
    Can J Surg; 2019 Apr; 62(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 30697990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome of short versus conventional stem for total hip arthroplasty in the femur with a high cortical index: a five year follow-up prospective multicentre comparative study.
    Pogliacomi F; Schiavi P; Grappiolo G; Ceccarelli F; Vaienti E
    Int Orthop; 2020 Jan; 44(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 31020342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compared fixation and survival of 280 lateralised vs 527 standard cementless stems after two years (1-7).
    Cantin O; Viste A; Desmarchelier R; Besse JL; Fessy MH
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Nov; 101(7):775-80. PubMed ID: 26476972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of a short versus a conventional femoral cementless stem in total hip arthroplasty in patients 70 years and older.
    Yu H; Liu H; Jia M; Hu Y; Zhang Y
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Mar; 11():33. PubMed ID: 27005904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conical Primary Cementless Stem in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: 94 Consecutive Implantations at a Mean Follow-Up of 12.7 years.
    Romagnoli S; Marullo M; Corbella M; Zero E; Parente A; Bargagliotti M
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Mar; 36(3):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 33187858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.