228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33675168)
21. The 21- to 27-year results of the Harris-Galante cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Kawamura H; Mishima H; Sugaya H; Nishino T; Shimizu Y; Miyakawa S
J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 26970833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Corail stem as a reverse hybrid - survivorship and x-ray analysis at 10 years.
Wangen H; Nordsletten L; Boldt JG; Fenstad AM; Beverland DE
Hip Int; 2017 Jul; 27(4):354-360. PubMed ID: 28218379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Clinical apprehension on application of Tri-lock BPS total hip arthroplasty].
Chen WL; Zhang L; Huang YJ; Cai CY; Lin RX; Yang GJ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2014 Jan; 27(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 24754148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparison of filling ratio, alignment, and stability between ABG
Bao X; Li M; Wu L; Jiang S; Shen B
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 37(6):641-646. PubMed ID: 37331936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study.
Gkagkalis G; Goetti P; Mai S; Meinecke I; Helmy N; Bosson D; Kutzner KP
BMC Geriatr; 2019 Apr; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 30995903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Primary total hip arthroplasty using a short bone-conserving stem in young adult osteoporotic patients with Dorr type C femoral bone.
Zhen P; Chang Y; Yue H; Chen H; Zhou S; Liu J; He X
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 16(1):17. PubMed ID: 33413495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant.
Wimmer MD; Randau TM; Deml MC; Ascherl R; Nöth U; Forst R; Gravius N; Wirtz D; Gravius S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jan; 14():19. PubMed ID: 23311769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is a short stem suitable for patients with hip dysplasia? A report on technical problems encountered during femoral reconstruction.
Buttaro MA; Slullitel PA; Zanotti G; Comba FM; Piccaluga F
Hip Int; 2018 May; 28(3):315-323. PubMed ID: 29048691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mid-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Long Cementless Monobloc Stem for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Chatelet JC; Ait-Si-Selmi T; Machenaud A; Ramos-Pascual S; ; Fessy MH
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):261-267. PubMed ID: 32819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of a conventional versus a short, anatomical metaphyseal-fitting cementless femoral stem in the treatment of patients with a fracture of the femoral neck.
Kim YH; Oh JH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 22628591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Femoral neck preservation with a short hip stem produced with powder manufacturing: mid-term results of a consecutive case series.
Schiraldi M; Bondi M; Renzi Brivio L
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 May; 29(4):801-806. PubMed ID: 30689043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of cylindrical and tapered stem designs for femoral revision hip arthroplasty.
Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Sun JN; Hua ZJ; Chen XY; Feng S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):411. PubMed ID: 32600293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interest of short implants in hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: comparative study "uncemented short" vs "cemented conventional" femoral stems.
Miladi M; Villain B; Mebtouche N; Bégué T; Aurégan JC
Int Orthop; 2018 Jul; 42(7):1669-1674. PubMed ID: 29761221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Downsizing in total hip arthroplasty. A short stem as a revision implant.
Coutandin M; Afghanyar Y; Rehbein P; Dargel J; Drees P; Kutzner KP
Orthopade; 2022 Mar; 51(3):230-238. PubMed ID: 34581833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Our experience with the metha short hip stem].
Lacko M; Filip V; Cellár R; Vaško G
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 24755060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mid-Term Follow-Up of Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using Jumbo Cups.
Zhang J; Huang Y; Zhou B; Zhou Y
Orthop Surg; 2019 Oct; 11(5):811-818. PubMed ID: 31549788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of collum femoris-preserving stems and ribbed stems in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Li M; Xu C; Xie J; Hu Y; Liu H
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 13(1):271. PubMed ID: 30373613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Distal femoral cortical hypertrophy after hip arthroplasty using a cementless doubletapered femoral stem.
Cho YJ; Chun YS; Rhyu KH; Baek JH; Liang H
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2016 Dec; 24(3):317-322. PubMed ID: 28031498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.
Ancelin D; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Delclaux S; Chiron P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
