These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33675838)

  • 1. Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.
    Murray CH; Li J; Weafer J; de Wit H
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2021 May; 204():173158. PubMed ID: 33675838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emotional traits predict individual differences in amphetamine-induced positive mood in healthy volunteers.
    Kirkpatrick MG; Goldenson NI; Kapadia N; Kahler CW; de Wit H; Swift RM; McGeary JE; Sussman S; Leventhal AM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Jan; 233(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 26429791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective Effects of Alcohol Predict Alcohol Choice in Social Drinkers.
    Li J; Murray CH; Weafer J; de Wit H
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2020 Dec; 44(12):2579-2587. PubMed ID: 33201577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rewarding effects of physical activity predict sensitivity to the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in healthy volunteers.
    Pester MS; Kirkpatrick MG; Geary BA; Leventhal AM
    J Psychopharmacol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):302-308. PubMed ID: 29338486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress-induced changes in mood and cortisol release predict mood effects of amphetamine.
    Hamidovic A; Childs E; Conrad M; King A; de Wit H
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2010 Jun; 109(1-3):175-80. PubMed ID: 20176450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam.
    de Wit H; Uhlenhuth EH; Johanson CE
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1986 Feb; 16(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 3698813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of amphetamine on reactivity to emotional stimuli.
    Wardle MC; de Wit H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2012 Mar; 220(1):143-53. PubMed ID: 21947316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Caffeine choice prospectively predicts positive subjective effects of caffeine and d-amphetamine.
    Sigmon SC; Griffiths RR
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2011 Nov; 118(2-3):341-8. PubMed ID: 21600707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between subjective effects and drug preferences: ethanol and diazepam.
    Chutuape MA; de Wit H
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1994 Feb; 34(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 8033763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction of expectancy and the pharmacological effects of d-amphetamine: subjective effects and self-administration.
    Mitchell SH; Laurent CL; de Wit H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1996 Jun; 125(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 8826542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in responses to ethanol and d-amphetamine: a within-subject study.
    Holdstock L; de Wit H
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2001 Apr; 25(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 11329494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drug preference and mood in humans: repeated assessment of d-amphetamine.
    Johanson CE; Uhlenhuth EH
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Feb; 14(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 7208558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine.
    Johanson CE; Uhlenhuth EH
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 71(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 6779335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.
    Kirkpatrick MG; Johanson CE; de Wit H
    J Psychopharmacol; 2013 Mar; 27(3):256-64. PubMed ID: 23343596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Norepinephrine transporter gene variation modulates acute response to D-amphetamine.
    Dlugos A; Freitag C; Hohoff C; McDonald J; Cook EH; Deckert J; de Wit H
    Biol Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 61(11):1296-305. PubMed ID: 17239355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain potential indices of novelty processing are associated with preference for amphetamine.
    Gabbay FH; Duncan CC; McDonald CG
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Dec; 18(6):470-88. PubMed ID: 21186922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of D-amphetamine on inhibition and motor planning as a function of baseline performance.
    Allman AA; Benkelfat C; Durand F; Sibon I; Dagher A; Leyton M; Baker GB; O'Driscoll GA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2010 Sep; 211(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 20602089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acute d-amphetamine pretreatment does not alter stimulant self-administration in humans.
    Stoops WW; Vansickel AR; Lile JA; Rush CR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007 May; 87(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17490738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stability of acute responses to drugs in humans across repeated testing: Findings with alcohol and amphetamine.
    Murray CH; Weafer J; de Wit H
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2020 Jul; 212():107989. PubMed ID: 32386922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subjective and behavioral effects of repeated d-amphetamine in humans.
    Wachtel SR; de Wit H
    Behav Pharmacol; 1999 May; 10(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 10780242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.