These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33676278)

  • 1. Evaluating an on-line cleaning agent for mitigating organic fouling in a reverse osmosis membrane.
    Park S; Hong SM; Park J; You S; Lee Y; Kim E; Cho KH
    Chemosphere; 2021 Jul; 275():130033. PubMed ID: 33676278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of organic fouling, reversibility by physical cleaning and concentrates in forward osmosis membrane processes for wastewater reclamation.
    Jung J; Ryu J; Yu Y; Kweon J
    Chemosphere; 2020 Apr; 245():125787. PubMed ID: 31959357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ionic fluid as a novel cleaning agent for the control of irreversible fouling in reverse osmosis membrane processes.
    Choi SJ; Kim S; Im SJ; Jang A; Hwang DS; Kang S
    Water Res; 2022 Oct; 224():119063. PubMed ID: 36122446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization.
    Akhondi E; Wu B; Sun S; Marxer B; Lim W; Gu J; Liu L; Burkhardt M; McDougald D; Pronk W; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2015 Mar; 70():158-73. PubMed ID: 25528546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modification of forward osmosis membrane with naturally-available humic acid: Towards simultaneously improved filtration performance and antifouling properties.
    Guan YF; Huang BC; Wang YJ; Gong B; Lu X; Yu HQ
    Environ Int; 2019 Oct; 131():105045. PubMed ID: 31352263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards a better hydraulic cleaning strategy for ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acid: Effect of backwash water composition.
    Chang H; Liang H; Qu F; Ma J; Ren N; Li G
    J Environ Sci (China); 2016 May; 43():177-186. PubMed ID: 27155423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydrophilic, bactericidal nanoheater-enabled reverse osmosis membranes to improve fouling resistance.
    Ray JR; Tadepalli S; Nergiz SZ; Liu KK; You L; Tang Y; Singamaneni S; Jun YS
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Jun; 7(21):11117-26. PubMed ID: 25941970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fatty acid fouling of forward osmosis membrane: Effects of pH, calcium, membrane orientation, initial permeate flux and foulant composition.
    Zhao P; Gao B; Yue Q; Liu P; Shon HK
    J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Aug; 46():55-62. PubMed ID: 27521936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fouling behavior of isolated dissolved organic fractions from seawater in reverse osmosis (RO) desalination process.
    Yin W; Li X; Suwarno SR; Cornelissen ER; Chong TH
    Water Res; 2019 Aug; 159():385-396. PubMed ID: 31121406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Opposite impacts of K
    Li B; He X; Wang P; Liu Q; Qiu W; Ma J
    Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116006. PubMed ID: 32585389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Humic Acid fouling mitigation by antiscalant in reverse osmosis system.
    Yang Q; Liu Y; Li Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):5153-8. PubMed ID: 20527757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synergistic effects of microplastics and organic foulants on the performance of forward osmosis membranes.
    Golgoli M; Khiadani M; Sen TK; Razmjou A; Johns ML; Zargar M
    Chemosphere; 2023 Jan; 311(Pt 1):136906. PubMed ID: 36270521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of physical and chemical aspects on membrane fouling and cleaning using interfacial free energy analysis in forward osmosis.
    Zhang W; Dong B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(22):21555-21567. PubMed ID: 29781060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep learning model for simulating influence of natural organic matter in nanofiltration.
    Shim J; Park S; Cho KH
    Water Res; 2021 Jun; 197():117070. PubMed ID: 33831775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Implications of adhesive interaction between membrane and organic matter on spontaneous osmotic backwash cleaning.
    Cai YH; Gopalakrishnan A; Deshmukh KP; Schäfer AI
    Water Res; 2022 Aug; 221():118752. PubMed ID: 35810632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of UF membrane fouling mechanisms caused by organic interactions in seawater.
    Resosudarmo A; Ye Y; Le-Clech P; Chen V
    Water Res; 2013 Feb; 47(2):911-21. PubMed ID: 23219388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osmotic cleaning of typical inorganic and organic foulants on reverse osmosis membrane for textile printing and dyeing wastewater treatment.
    Hu Z; Guan D; Sun Z; Zhang Z; Shan Y; Wu Y; Gong C; Ren X
    Chemosphere; 2023 Sep; 336():139162. PubMed ID: 37290520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of tannic acid on membrane fouling and membrane cleaning in forward osmosis.
    Zhang W; Wang L; Dong B
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 76(11-12):3160-3170. PubMed ID: 29210702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.