150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33676583)
1. Implementation of prostate cancer treatment decision aid in Michigan: a qualitative study.
Paudel R; Ferrante S; Woodford J; Maitland C; Stockall E; Maatman T; Lane GI; Berry DL; Sales AE; Montie JE;
Implement Sci Commun; 2021 Mar; 2(1):27. PubMed ID: 33676583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors Associated with Decision Aid Use in Localized Prostate Cancer.
Lane GI; Dupati A; Qi J; Ferrante S; Dunn RL; Paudel R; Wittmann D; Wallner L; Berry DL; Ellimoottil C; Montie J; Clemens JQ
Urol Pract; 2022 Jan; 9(1):108-115. PubMed ID: 35722246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and evaluation of the personal patient profile-prostate (P3P), a Web-based decision support system for men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.
Berry DL; Halpenny B; Wolpin S; Davison BJ; Ellis WJ; Lober WB; McReynolds J; Wulff J
J Med Internet Res; 2010 Dec; 12(4):e67. PubMed ID: 21169159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptions of Urologists About the Conversational Elements Leading to Treatment Decision-Making Among Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients.
Adsul P; Wray R; Boyd D; Weaver N; Siddiqui S
J Cancer Educ; 2017 Sep; 32(3):580-588. PubMed ID: 27029194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Impact of Decision Aid Use on Post Prostatectomy Patient Reported Outcomes.
Lane GI; Qi J; Dupati A; Ferrante S; Dunn RL; Paudel R; Wittmann D; Wallner LP; Berry DL; Ellimoottil C; Montie JE; Clemens JQ;
Urology; 2022 Jul; 165():187-192. PubMed ID: 35219768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assigning value to preparation for prostate cancer decision making: a willingness to pay analysis.
Wilson LS; Blonquist TM; Hong F; Halpenny B; Wolpin S; Chang P; Filson CP; Master VA; Sanda MG; Chien GW; Jones RA; Krupski TL; Berry DL
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30626400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptation and Implementation of a Shared Decision-Making Tool From One Health Context to Another: Partnership Approach Using Mixed Methods.
Turnbull S; Walsh NE; Moore AJ
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jul; 25():e42551. PubMed ID: 37405845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Racial/ethnicity differences in endorsing influential factors for prostate cancer treatment choice: An analysis of data from the personal patient profile-prostate (P3P) I and II trials.
Trinh QD; Hong F; Halpenny B; Epstein M; Berry DL
Urol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):78.e7-78.e13. PubMed ID: 31883873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Engaging disparities in prostate cancer: Piloting an interactive, virtual workshop to educate providers on shared decision-making for underserved populations.
Mistry NA; Sweis J; Ofori B; McKoy JM; Langford A; Psutka SP; Perazza E; Raman JD; Murphy AB
Urol Oncol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):430.e1-430.e7. PubMed ID: 37453812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should we involve patients more actively? Perspectives of the multidisciplinary team on shared decision-making for older patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
de Angst IB; Kil PJM; Bangma CH; Takkenberg JJM
J Geriatr Oncol; 2019 Jul; 10(4):653-658. PubMed ID: 30639265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceived vs Actual Shared Decision-Making Behavior Among Urologists: A Convergent, Parallel, Mixed-Methods Study of Self-Reported Practice.
Ippolito GM; Reines K; Meeks WD; Mbassa R; Ellimoottil C; Faris A; Reuland DS; Nielsen ME; Teal R; Vu M; Clemens JQ; Tan HJ
Urology; 2024 Jan; 183():78-84. PubMed ID: 37996015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating Clinical Implementation Approaches for Prostate Cancer Decision Support.
Berry DL; Hong F; Halpenny B; Sanda MG; Master VA; Filson CP; Chang P; Chien GW; Underhill M; Fox E; McReynolds J; Wolpin S
Urol Pract; 2019 Mar; 6(2):93-99. PubMed ID: 34350322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.
Bosco JL; Halpenny B; Berry DL
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2012 Sep; 10():123. PubMed ID: 23021156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing implementation of a computerized, individualized, culturally tailored lupus decision aid in lupus clinics: a qualitative semi-structured interview study.
Qu H; Hu X; Singh JA
Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Oct; 38(10):2793-2801. PubMed ID: 31222574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing implementation of a patient decision aid in a developing country: an exploratory study.
Tong WT; Lee YK; Ng CJ; Lee PY
Implement Sci; 2017 Mar; 12(1):40. PubMed ID: 28327157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protocol for a pre-implementation and post-implementation study on shared decision-making in the surgical treatment of women with early-stage breast cancer.
Savelberg W; Moser A; Smidt M; Boersma L; Haekens C; van der Weijden T
BMJ Open; 2015 Mar; 5(3):e007698. PubMed ID: 25829374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of factors influencing the implementation of two shared decision-making interventions in contraceptive care: a qualitative interview study among clinical and administrative staff.
Munro S; Manski R; Donnelly KZ; Agusti D; Stevens G; Banach M; Boardman MB; Brady P; Bradt CC; Foster T; Johnson DJ; Norsigian J; Nothnagle M; Shepherd HL; Stern L; Trevena L; Elwyn G; Thompson R
Implement Sci; 2019 Nov; 14(1):95. PubMed ID: 31706329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study.
Lumbreras B; Parker LA; Alonso-Coello P; Mira-Bernabeu J; Gómez-Pérez L; Caballero-Romeu JP; Pertusa-Martínez S; Cebrián-Cuenca A; Moral-Peláez I; López-Garrigós M; Canelo-Aybar C; Ronda E; Guilabert M; Prieto-González A; Hernández-Aguado I
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35897274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.
Yu CH; Ke C; Jovicic A; Hall S; Straus SE;
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Sep; 19(1):186. PubMed ID: 31533828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice": Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice-Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care.
Waddell A; Goodwin D; Spassova G; Bragge P
MDM Policy Pract; 2023; 8(2):23814683231199943. PubMed ID: 37743932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
