BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33676807)

  • 1. Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Captured With a Smartphone - Measurements With Added Ambient Noise.
    Uloza V; Ulozaitė-Stanienė N; Petrauskas T; Kregždytė R
    J Voice; 2023 May; 37(3):465.e19-465.e26. PubMed ID: 33676807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the feasibility of the combination of acoustic voice quality index and glottal function index for voice pathology screening.
    Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Šaferis V; Uloza V
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 276(6):1737-1745. PubMed ID: 31016388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
    Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
    J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
    Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.
    Faham M; Laukkanen AM; Ikävalko T; Rantala L; Geneid A; Holmqvist-Jämsén S; Ruusuvirta K; Pirilä S
    J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.
    Yeşilli-Puzella G; Tadıhan-Özkan E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2022 Sep; 36(5):736.e25-736.e32. PubMed ID: 32962941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
    Maryn Y; Ysenbaert F; Zarowski A; Vanspauwen R
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones.
    Bottalico P; Codino J; Cantor-Cutiva LC; Marks K; Nudelman CJ; Skeffington J; Shrivastav R; Jackson-Menaldi MC; Hunter EJ; Rubin AD
    J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):320-334. PubMed ID: 30471944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of Universal-Platform-Based
    Uloza V; Ulozaitė-Stanienė N; Petrauskas T; Pribuišis K; Blažauskas T; Damaševičius R; Maskeliūnas R
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jun; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 37373811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of Acoustic Measures Obtained Using Various Recording Methods Including Smartphones With and Without Headset Microphones.
    Awan SN; Bahr R; Watts S; Boyer M; Budinsky R; ; Bensoussan Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1712-1730. PubMed ID: 38749007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An iOS-based VoiceScreen application: feasibility for use in clinical settings-a pilot study.
    Uloza V; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jan; 280(1):277-284. PubMed ID: 35906420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research.
    Lebacq J; Schoentgen J; Cantarella G; Bruss FT; Manfredi C; DeJonckere P
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
    Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Acoustic Analyses of Voice in Nonoptimized Conditions.
    van der Woerd B; Wu M; Parsa V; Doyle PC; Fung K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3991-3999. PubMed ID: 33186510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Russian language].
    Choynzonov EL; Kononova LA; Krasavina EA; Kulbakin DE; Mukhina VI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2022; 87(5):34-38. PubMed ID: 36404688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Vegiene A; Pribuisiene R; Saferis V; Vaiciukynas E; Gelzinis A; Verikas A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3391-9. PubMed ID: 26162450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index AVQI and the Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) when wearing CoViD-19 protective masks.
    Lehnert B; Herold J; Blaurock M; Busch CJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Sep; 279(9):4617-4621. PubMed ID: 35522325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.