236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33677745)
1. Stereoscopic virtual reality does not improve knowledge acquisition of congenital heart disease.
Patel N; Costa A; Sanders SP; Ezon D
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jul; 37(7):2283-2290. PubMed ID: 33677745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model.
Chen S; Zhu J; Cheng C; Pan Z; Liu L; Du J; Shen X; Shen Z; Zhu H; Liu J; Yang H; Ma C; Pan H
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 20(1):395. PubMed ID: 33129310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "From Vision to Reality: Virtual Reality's Impact on Baffle Planning in Congenital Heart Disease".
Priya S; La Russa D; Walling A; Goetz S; Hartig T; Khayat A; Gupta P; Nagpal P; Ashwath R
Pediatr Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 45(1):165-174. PubMed ID: 37932525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fast-track virtual reality for cardiac imaging in congenital heart disease.
Raimondi F; Vida V; Godard C; Bertelli F; Reffo E; Boddaert N; El Beheiry M; Masson JB
J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2598-2602. PubMed ID: 33760302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual Reality Angiogram vs 3-Dimensional Printed Angiogram as an Educational tool-A Comparative Study.
Bairamian D; Liu S; Eftekhar B
Neurosurgery; 2019 Aug; 85(2):E343-E349. PubMed ID: 30715444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Immersive Virtual Reality Headset Viewing on Young Children: Visuomotor Function, Postural Stability, and Motion Sickness.
Tychsen L; Foeller P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 209():151-159. PubMed ID: 31377280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy.
Moro C; Štromberga Z; Raikos A; Stirling A
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):549-559. PubMed ID: 28419750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual reality and cardiac anatomy: Exploring immersive three-dimensional cardiac imaging, a pilot study in undergraduate medical anatomy education.
Maresky HS; Oikonomou A; Ali I; Ditkofsky N; Pakkal M; Ballyk B
Clin Anat; 2019 Mar; 32(2):238-243. PubMed ID: 30295333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) vs 3D printed models of congenital heart disease in resident and nurse practitioner educational experience.
Awori J; Friedman SD; Howard C; Kronmal R; Buddhe S
3D Print Med; 2023 Feb; 9(1):2. PubMed ID: 36773171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Electrophysiological characteristics of emotion arousal difference between stereoscopic and non-stereoscopic virtual reality films].
Tian F; Zhang W; Li Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 39(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 35231966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect of Stereoscopic Augmented Reality Visualization on Learning Anatomy and the Modifying Effect of Visual-Spatial Abilities: A Double-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bogomolova K; van der Ham IJM; Dankbaar MEW; van den Broek WW; Hovius SER; van der Hage JA; Hierck BP
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):558-567. PubMed ID: 31887792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 360° virtual reality video for the acquisition of knot tying skills: A randomised controlled trial.
Yoganathan S; Finch DA; Parkin E; Pollard J
Int J Surg; 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A):24-27. PubMed ID: 29649669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the stereoscopic virtual reality display system for the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: A Icomparison with conventional computed tomography workstation and 3D rotational angiography.
Liu X; Tao H; Xiao X; Guo B; Xu S; Sun N; Li M; Xie L; Wu C
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 170():93-98. PubMed ID: 29753884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Creating 3D models from Radiologic Images for Virtual Reality Medical Education Modules.
Ammanuel S; Brown I; Uribe J; Rehani B
J Med Syst; 2019 May; 43(6):166. PubMed ID: 31053902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease.
Lau I; Gupta A; Sun Z
Biomolecules; 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34198642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual Reality in Anatomy: A Pilot Study Evaluating Different Delivery Modalities.
Birbara NS; Sammut C; Pather N
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Jul; 13(4):445-457. PubMed ID: 31587471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized Trial of a Virtual Reality Tool to Teach Surgical Technique for Tibial Shaft Fracture Intramedullary Nailing.
Blumstein G; Zukotynski B; Cevallos N; Ishmael C; Zoller S; Burke Z; Clarkson S; Park H; Bernthal N; SooHoo NF
J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(4):969-977. PubMed ID: 32035854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D virtual reality vs. 2D desktop registration user interface comparison.
Bueckle A; Buehling K; Shih PC; Börner K
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258103. PubMed ID: 34705835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Zhao J; Xu X; Jiang H; Ding Y
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Apr; 20(1):127. PubMed ID: 32334594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First trimester anomaly scan using virtual reality (VR FETUS study): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.
Pietersma CS; Mulders AGMGJ; Moolenaar LM; Hunink MGM; Koning AHJ; Willemsen SP; Go ATJI; Steegers EAP; Rousian M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Sep; 20(1):515. PubMed ID: 32894073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
