134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33677760)
1. In Search of the Lost Clip: Outcome of Women After Needle-Guided Lumpectomy of a Marking Clip.
Green RT; Weiser R; Golan O; Menes TS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):4974-4980. PubMed ID: 33677760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative loss of core biopsy clips: clinical implications.
Calhoun K; Giuliano A; Brenner RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Mar; 190(3):W196-200. PubMed ID: 18287412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound-Guided Segmental Mastectomy and Excisional Biopsy Using Hydrogel-Encapsulated Clip Localization as an Alternative to Wire Localization.
Gentile LF; Himmler A; Shaw CM; Bouton A; Vorhis E; Marshall J; Spiguel LR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3284-9. PubMed ID: 27338745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High resolution intra-operative two-dimensional specimen mammography and its impact on second operation for re-excision of positive margins at final pathology after breast conservation surgery.
Bathla L; Harris A; Davey M; Sharma P; Silva E
Am J Surg; 2011 Oct; 202(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 21943945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of multiple wire localization for larger breast cancers: when can mastectomy be avoided?
Kirstein LJ; Rafferty E; Specht MC; Moore RH; Taghian AG; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Sep; 207(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 18722938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radio-guided vs clip-guided localization of nonpalpable mass-like lesions of the breast from a screened population: A propensity score-matched study.
Corsi F; Bossi D; Combi F; Papadopoulou O; Amadori R; Regolo L; Trifirò G; Albasini S; Mazzucchelli S; Sorrentino L
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 119(7):916-924. PubMed ID: 30742309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.
Tartter PI; Kaplan J; Bleiweiss I; Gajdos C; Kong A; Ahmed S; Zapetti D
Am J Surg; 2000 Feb; 179(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10773138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-Term Outcomes of Multiple-Wire Localizations for More Extensive Breast Cancer: Multiple-Wire Excision Does Not Increase Recurrence, Unplanned Imaging, or Biopsies.
Brown CL; McEvoy MP; Smith BL; Lanahan CR; Kelly BN; Coopey SB; Hughes KS; Oseni TS; McGugin C; Wong SM; Gadd MA; Specht MC
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 31859233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance With an Ultrasound-Visible Clip: A Practical and Cost-effective Option for Breast Cancer Localization.
Konen J; Murphy S; Berkman A; Ahern TP; Sowden M
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 May; 39(5):911-917. PubMed ID: 31737930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen.
Lee CH; Carter D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 7998574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resection margin status in lumpectomy specimens for duct carcinoma of the breast: correlation with core biopsy and mammographic findings.
Mai KT; Chaudhuri M; Perkins DG; Mirsky D
J Surg Oncol; 2001 Nov; 78(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 11745804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins.
Gibson GR; Lesnikoski BA; Yoo J; Mott LA; Cady B; Barth RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Oct; 8(9):693-704. PubMed ID: 11597009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium.
van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the Accuracy of Axillary Lymph Node Surgery in Breast Cancer with Ultrasound-Guided Wire Localization of Biopsy Proven Metastatic Lymph Nodes.
Plecha D; Bai S; Patterson H; Thompson C; Shenk R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22(13):4241-6. PubMed ID: 25814365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clip placement after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Thornton CM; Rosen PP
Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 9356622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is postexcision, preradiation mammogram necessary in patients after breast-conserving surgery with negative margins.
Adkisson CD; McLaughlin SA; Vallow LA; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; Bagaria SP; Howe N; Gibson T; Pockaj B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):3205-11. PubMed ID: 23975292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]