134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33677760)
21. Localization Methods for Excisional Biopsy in Women With Nonpalpable Mammographic Abnormalities.
Rodhouse C; Soliman I; Cruse M; Kastrenakes J; Augustine CJ; Ludy A; Reintgen E; Hoadley A; Desai D; Nguyen M; Reintgen DS
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 27864044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation).
Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 7839960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers.
Fisher CS; Mushawah FA; Cyr AE; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 21861232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiographically guided shave margins may reduce lumpectomy re-excision rates.
Larson KE; Jadeja P; Marko A; Jadeja V; Pratt D
Breast J; 2018 Sep; 24(5):820-822. PubMed ID: 29687530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Long-term outcome for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ managed with breast conservation treatment: prognostic significance of reexcision.
Vapiwala N; Harris E; Hwang WT; Solin LJ
Cancer J; 2006; 12(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 16613659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Operative outcomes of conventional specimen radiography versus in-operating room specimen radiography in radioactive seed-localized segmental mastectomies.
Rhee D; Pockaj B; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Pizzitola V; Giurescu M; Patel B; McCarthy J; Gray R
Am J Surg; 2018 Jan; 215(1):151-154. PubMed ID: 28784236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Localization of nonpalpable breast lesions with sonographically visible clip: optimizing tailored resection and clear margins.
Corsi F; Sorrentino L; Sartani A; Bossi D; Amadori R; Nebuloni M; Truffi M; Bonzini M; Foschi D
Am J Surg; 2015 Jun; 209(6):950-8. PubMed ID: 25457243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Superiority of sonographic hematoma guided resection of mammogram only visible breast cancer: wire localization should be an exception--not the rule.
Layeequr Rahman R; Crawford S; Larkin A; Quinlan R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):2228-32. PubMed ID: 17514405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical clips vs. iodine-125 (125I) seeds for marking the location of nonpalpable malignant breast lesions: preliminary results.
Mendoza Arnau I; Sánchez Sánchez R; Culiáñez Casas M; Rebollo Aguirre ÁC; González Jiménez AD; Martínez Meca S
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2020; 62(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 31300213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Radio-guided and clip-guided preoperative localization for malignant microcalcifications offer similar performances in breast-conserving surgery.
Corsi F; Bossi D; Sartani A; Papadopoulou O; Amadori R; Scoccia E; Trifirò G; Albasini S; Truffi M; Bonizzi A; Sorrentino L
Breast J; 2019 Sep; 25(5):865-873. PubMed ID: 31187568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rapid Implementation of Intraoperative Ultrasonography to Reduce Wire Localization in The Permanente Medical Group.
Chang S; Brooke M; Cureton E; Yeh A; Chen R; Mazzetti-Barros N; Rahbari R; Butler S; Hill N; Shim V
Perm J; 2019; 23():. PubMed ID: 31314730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The ABBI system as a possibility for evaluating non-palpable lesions].
Winzer KJ; Filimonow S; Guski H; Bick U; Hamm B; Müller JM
Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():57-62. PubMed ID: 10063575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial.
Rahusen FD; Bremers AJ; Fabry HF; van Amerongen AH; Boom RP; Meijer S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2002 Dec; 9(10):994-8. PubMed ID: 12464592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mammographic findings in breast cancer patients, who were treated with breast conserving therapy.
Tangkaratt S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Dec; 87(12):1439-43. PubMed ID: 15822537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Additional Cavity Shaving at the Time of Breast-Conserving Surgery Enhances Accuracy of Margin Status Examination.
Pata G; Bartoli M; Bianchi A; Pasini M; Roncali S; Ragni F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2802-8. PubMed ID: 27034079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Involved margins after lumpectomy for breast cancer: Always to be re-excised?
Sorrentino L; Agozzino M; Albasini S; Bossi D; Mazzucchelli S; Vanna R; Papadopoulou O; Villani L; Corsi F
Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30():141-146. PubMed ID: 31500779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predictors of Residual Disease After Breast Conservation Surgery.
Findlay-Shirras LJ; Outbih O; Muzyka CN; Galloway K; Hebbard PC; Nashed M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):1936-1942. PubMed ID: 29748884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) versus wire-guided lumpectomy for non-palpable breast lesions: a randomized prospective evaluation.
Medina-Franco H; Abarca-Pérez L; García-Alvarez MN; Ulloa-Gómez JL; Romero-Trejo C; Sepúlveda-Méndez J
J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 97(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 18181162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Imaging Factors That Influence Surgical Margins After Preoperative 125I Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: Comparison With Wire Localization.
Dryden MJ; Dogan BE; Fox P; Wang C; Black DM; Hunt K; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 27007608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
