157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33677990)
1. Accuracy of Clarius, Handheld Wireless Point-of-Care Ultrasound, in Evaluating Prostate Morphology and Volume Compared to Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight: Is There a Difference between Transabdominal
Moussaoui G; Zakaria AS; Negrean C; Nguyen DD; Couture F; Tholomier C; Sadri I; Arezki A; Schwartz RN; Elterman DS; Misrai V; Bhojani N; Herrmann TRW; Zorn KC
J Endourol; 2021 Sep; 35(9):1300-1306. PubMed ID: 33677990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transabdominal ultrasound and MRI with the radical prostatectomy specimen volume: a retrospective observational study.
Guo S; Zhang J; Jiao J; Li Z; Wu P; Jing Y; Qin W; Wang F; Ma S
BMC Urol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):62. PubMed ID: 37069539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of transrectal and transabodominal ultrasound measurement of transition zone volume with post-operative enucleated adenoma volume in benign prostatic hypertrophy.
Ajayi I; Aremu A; Olajide A; Bello T; Olajide F; Adetiloye V
Pan Afr Med J; 2013; 16():149. PubMed ID: 24876907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups.
Bienz M; Hueber PA; Al-Hathal N; McCormack M; Bhojani N; Trinh QD; Zorn KC
Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of PSA density by 3 imaging modalities and its correlation with the PSA density of radical prostatectomy specimen.
Varkarakis I; Zarkadoulias A; Bourdoumis A; Chatzidarellis E; Antoniou N; Deliveliotis C
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1038-42. PubMed ID: 22196747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Body mass index, prostate weight and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume accuracy.
Sajadi KP; Terris MK; Hamilton RJ; Cullen J; Amling CL; Kane CJ; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):990-5. PubMed ID: 17632170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Lee JS; Chung BH
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of urologists and radiologists.
Nunez-Nateras R; Andrews JR; Martin GL; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR; Ferrigni RG; Eversman WG; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):4985-8. PubMed ID: 20156377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TRUS versus transabdominal ultrasound as a predictor of enucleated adenoma weight in patients with BPH: a tool for standard preoperative work-up?
Stravodimos KG; Petrolekas A; Kapetanakis T; Vourekas S; Koritsiadis G; Adamakis I; Mitropoulos D; Constantinides C
Int Urol Nephrol; 2009 Dec; 41(4):767-71. PubMed ID: 19350408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Accuracy of prostatic ultrasonography versus MRI in measuring prostate volume].
Hou JL; Ma WL; Dong X; Zhu XY; Zhang Q; Qiu XF; Zhuang JL; Huang HF; Guo HQ; Gan WD
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2022 Oct; 28(10):896-900. PubMed ID: 37838956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which is the best radiological imaging method for predicting actual prostate weight?
Gok B; Hajiyev E; Hamidi N; Koc E; Asil E; Canda AE; Ardicoglu A; Atmaca AF; Keseroglu BB
Andrologia; 2020 Nov; 52(10):e13770. PubMed ID: 32721048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate cancer risk assessment by the primary care physician and urologist: transabdominal- versus transrectal ultrasound prostate volume-based use of the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator.
de Vos II; Drost FH; Bokhorst LP; Alberts AR; van Gelder M; Herman EM; Boswinkel WD; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Transl Androl Urol; 2023 Feb; 12(2):241-248. PubMed ID: 36915892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume--analysis of data from the CaPSURE Database.
Konety BR; Sadetsky N; Carroll PR;
J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1423-5; discussion 1425-6. PubMed ID: 17382745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of bland-altman method in comparing transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography for estimating prostate volume.
Babaei Jandaghi A; Shakiba M; Nasseh H; Korouji Y; Esmaeili S; Khadem Maboudi AA; Khorshidi A
Iran J Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 40(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25650064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peri-prostatic nerve block using Clarius EC7 HD₃ handheld ultrasound guidance.
Hamouda A; Ibrahim A; Corsi N; Elterman DS; Chughtai B; Bhojani N; Zorn KC
Can J Urol; 2023 Dec; 30(6):11741-11746. PubMed ID: 38104332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate volume estimations using magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound compared to radical prostatectomy specimens.
Paterson NR; Lavallée LT; Nguyen LN; Witiuk K; Ross J; Mallick R; Shabana W; MacDonald B; Scheida N; Fergusson D; Momoli F; Cnossen S; Morash C; Cagiannos I; Breau RH
Can Urol Assoc J; 2016 Aug; 10(7-8):264-268. PubMed ID: 27878049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of prostate volume measurement using transabdominal ultrasonography for the improvement of prostate-speci fi c antigen-based cancer detection.
Kobayashi T; Kawahara T; Nishizawa K; Ogura K; Mitsumori K; Ide Y
Int J Urol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):881-5. PubMed ID: 16323981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What is the best radiological method to predict the actual weight of the prostate?
Kiliç M; Ozdemir AT; Altinova S; Atmaca AF; Canda AE; Balbay MD
Turk J Med Sci; 2014; 44(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 25558555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Tewari A; Indudhara R; Shinohara K; Schalow E; Woods M; Lee R; Anderson C; Narayan P
J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 May; 24(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8727414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
Massanova M; Robertson S; Barone B; Dutto L; Caputo VF; Bhatt JR; Ahmad I; Bada M; Obeidallah A; Crocetto F
Urol Int; 2021; 105(9-10):804-810. PubMed ID: 34247169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]