These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33678440)

  • 1. Retrospective clinical study of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with a straightforward completely digital workflow.
    Wu L; Sun Z; Zhao J; Zheng Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):913-918. PubMed ID: 33678440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study.
    De Angelis P; Passarelli PC; Gasparini G; Boniello R; D'Amato G; De Angelis S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 31202552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures.
    Sailer I; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 28024819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical quality and efficiency of monolithic glass ceramic crowns in the posterior area: digital compared with conventional workflows.
    Mühlemann S; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(3):215-223. PubMed ID: 30264050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival analysis up to 7 years of 621 zirconia monolithic single crowns with feather-edge margins fabricated with a cast-free workflow starting from intraoral scans: A multicentric retrospective study.
    Valenti M; Valenti A; Schmitz JH; Cortellini D; Canale A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 35850872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical outcome of single posterior implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated using full digital workflow and conventional workflow: a 3-year follow-up].
    Gao SH; Guo DN; Zhou YS; Pan SX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 57(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 35280005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns.
    Del Piñal M; Lopez-Suarez C; Bartolome JF; Volpato CA; Suarez MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):323.e1-323.e7. PubMed ID: 33176924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional fit of self-glazed zirconia monolithic crowns fabricated by wet deposition.
    Li Y; Zhao J; Sun Z; Lin N; Zheng Y
    Dent Mater J; 2022 May; 41(3):363-367. PubMed ID: 35095041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Outcomes of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns with CAD/CAM Technology. A 1-Year Follow-Up Prospective Clinical Study of 65 Patients.
    Konstantinidis I; Trikka D; Gasparatos S; Mitsias ME
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Nov; 15(11):. PubMed ID: 30424474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal Fit Evaluation of CAD/CAM All Ceramic Crowns Obtained by Two Digital Workflows: An In Vitro Study Using Micro-CT Technology.
    Duqum IS; Brenes C; Mendonca G; Carneiro TAPN; Cooper LF
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1037-1043. PubMed ID: 31621973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time efficiency and efficacy of a centralized computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing workflow for implant crown fabrication: A prospective controlled clinical study.
    Mühlemann S; Lamperti ST; Stucki L; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104332. PubMed ID: 36252858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-Efficiency Analysis Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows for Implant Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Crossover Trial.
    Joda T; Brägger U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1047-53. PubMed ID: 26394340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Split-File Digital Workflow on Crown Margin Adaptation.
    Sheridan RR; Verrett R; Haney S; Schoolfield J
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):571-580. PubMed ID: 28598591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.