These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33678987)

  • 1. Annotating Argument Schemes.
    Visser J; Lawrence J; Reed C; Wagemans J; Walton D
    Argumentation; 2021; 35(1):101-139. PubMed ID: 33678987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Argumentation schemes, fallacies, and evidence in politicians' argumentative tweets-A coded dataset.
    Macagno F
    Data Brief; 2022 Oct; 44():108501. PubMed ID: 35990918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Devil is in the Framework. Comment on Mizrahi vs. all Debate on the Strength of Arguments from an Expert Opinion.
    Makuła S
    Philosophia (Ramat Gan); 2022; 50(4):1999-2013. PubMed ID: 35469246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual Analysis of Argumentation in Essays.
    Kiesel D; Riehmann P; Wachsmuth H; Stein B; Froehlich B
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2021 Feb; 27(2):1139-1148. PubMed ID: 33048728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation.
    Reed C; Budzynska K; Duthie R; Janier M; Konat B; Lawrence J; Pease A; Snaith M
    Philos Technol; 2017; 30(2):137-160. PubMed ID: 32025475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legitimation Without Argumentation: An Empirical Discourse Analysis of 'Validity as an Argument' in Assessment.
    Kinnear B; Schumacher DJ; Varpio L; Driessen EW; Konopasky A
    Perspect Med Educ; 2024; 13(1):469-480. PubMed ID: 39372230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans.
    Walton D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1507-1528. PubMed ID: 28000092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.
    Lillo-Unglaube M; Canales-Johnson A; Navarrete G; Bravo CF
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1420. PubMed ID: 25566112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty.
    Straßer C; Michajlova L
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1133998. PubMed ID: 37275534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fusion weighted features and BiLSTM-attention model for argument mining of EFL writing.
    Yang J; Zheng M; Liu Y
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1049266. PubMed ID: 36760436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arguing collaboratively: Argumentative discourse types and their potential for knowledge building.
    Felton M; Garcia-Mila M; Villarroel C; Gilabert S
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):372-86. PubMed ID: 25975525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EQRbot: A chatbot delivering EQR argument-based explanations.
    Castagna F; Garton A; McBurney P; Parsons S; Sassoon I; Sklar EI
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1045614. PubMed ID: 37035536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to Play the "Playing God" Card.
    Mizrahi M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Jun; 26(3):1445-1461. PubMed ID: 31925661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reasoning on conflicting information: An empirical study of Formal Argumentation.
    Guillaume M; Cramer M; van der Torre L; Schiltz C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273225. PubMed ID: 35984811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sketching the vision of the Web of Debates.
    Bikakis A; Flouris G; Patkos T; Plexousakis D
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1124045. PubMed ID: 37396970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian argumentation and the value of logical validity.
    Eva B; Hartmann S
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Oct; 125(5):806-821. PubMed ID: 30024177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing a Conversational Agent's Capability to Identify Structural Wrongness in Arguments Based on Toulmin's Model of Arguments.
    Mirzababaei B; Pammer-Schindler V
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():645516. PubMed ID: 34927062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linked Argumentation Graphs for Multidisciplinary Decision Support.
    Xiao L; Greer D
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Feb; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 36833121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The neural bases of argumentative reasoning.
    Prado J; Léone J; Epinat-Duclos J; Trouche E; Mercier H
    Brain Lang; 2020 Sep; 208():104827. PubMed ID: 32590183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The DDI corpus: an annotated corpus with pharmacological substances and drug-drug interactions.
    Herrero-Zazo M; Segura-Bedmar I; Martínez P; Declerck T
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Oct; 46(5):914-20. PubMed ID: 23906817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.