These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33679563)

  • 1. Embodied Displays of "Doing Thinking." Epistemic and Interactive Functions of Thinking Displays in Children's Argumentative Activities.
    Heller V
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():636671. PubMed ID: 33679563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children as Investigators of Brunerian "Possible Worlds". The Role of Narrative Scenarios in children's Argumentative Thinking.
    Iannaccone A; Perret-Clermont AN; Convertini J
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2019 Dec; 53(4):679-693. PubMed ID: 31729627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deixis, Meta-Perceptive Gaze Practices, and the Interactional Achievement of Joint Attention.
    Stukenbrock A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1779. PubMed ID: 33041877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
    Mercier H; Sperber D
    Behav Brain Sci; 2011 Apr; 34(2):57-74; discussion 74-111. PubMed ID: 21447233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Curious, thoughtful and affirmative-Young children's meanings of participation in healthcare situations when using an interactive communication tool.
    Stålberg A; Sandberg A; Larsson T; Coyne I; Söderbäck M
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Jan; 27(1-2):235-246. PubMed ID: 28514530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring Conversational and Physiological Aspects of Psychotherapy Talk.
    Avdi E; Evans C
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():591124. PubMed ID: 33250829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Look together: analyzing gaze coordination with epistemic network analysis.
    Andrist S; Collier W; Gleicher M; Mutlu B; Shaffer D
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1016. PubMed ID: 26257677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Be rational!" Epistemic aims and socio-cognitive tension in argumentation about dietary choices.
    Brocos P; Jiménez-Aleixandre MP; Baker MJ
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():933062. PubMed ID: 36304868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's Judgments of Epistemic and Moral Agents: From Situations to Intentions.
    Koenig MA; Tiberius V; Hamlin JK
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 May; 14(3):344-360. PubMed ID: 30629887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-Lasting Conceptual Change in Science Education: The Role of U-shaped Pattern of Argumentative Dialogue in Collaborative Argumentation.
    Li X; Li Y; Wang W
    Sci Educ (Dordr); 2023; 32(1):123-168. PubMed ID: 34803230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Links between parents' epistemological stance and children's evidence talk.
    Luce MR; Callanan MA; Smilovic S
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Mar; 49(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 23244409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epistemic Responsibility - Labored, Loosened, and Lost: Staging Alzheimer's Disease.
    Schrauf RW
    J Pragmat; 2020 Oct; 168():56-68. PubMed ID: 32943809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The benefits of acquiring interactional expertise: Why (some) philosophers of science should engage scientific communities.
    Plaisance KS
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Oct; 83():53-62. PubMed ID: 32958281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Without Words: Verbally Incomplete Utterances in Complaints.
    Skogmyr Marian K
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():689443. PubMed ID: 34646193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making.
    Djulbegovic B; Elqayam S
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Oct; 23(5):915-922. PubMed ID: 28730671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Securing recipiency in workplace meetings: Multimodal practices.
    Ford CE; Stickle T
    Discourse Stud; 2012 Feb; 14(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 24976789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thinking differently about thinking positive: a discursive approach to cancer patients' talk.
    Wilkinson S; Kitzinger C
    Soc Sci Med; 2000 Mar; 50(6):797-811. PubMed ID: 10695978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of children's epistemic beliefs across the early years of elementary school.
    Walker S; Lunn-Brownlee J; Scholes L; Johansson E
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2020 May; 90(2):266-281. PubMed ID: 30955217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Embodied Irrationality? Knowledge Avoidance, Willful Ignorance, and the Paradox of Autonomy.
    Arfini S; Magnani L
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():769591. PubMed ID: 34899518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Argumentative Theory: Predictions and Empirical Evidence.
    Mercier H
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Sep; 20(9):689-700. PubMed ID: 27450708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.