These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33679899)

  • 1. Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping.
    Obšteter J; Jenko J; Gorjanc G
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():637017. PubMed ID: 33679899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of sexed semen and female genotyping affects genetic and economic outcomes of Montbéliarde dairy herds depending on the farming system considered.
    Bérodier M; Brochard M; Boichard D; Dezetter C; Bareille N; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):10073-10087. PubMed ID: 31447148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle: When dry matter intake recordings are sparse under different scenarios.
    Negussie E; Mehtiö T; Mäntysaari P; Løvendahl P; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7248-7262. PubMed ID: 31155258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genotyping more cows increases genetic gain and reduces rate of true inbreeding in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using female reproductive technologies.
    Thomasen JR; Liu H; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):597-606. PubMed ID: 31733861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Simianer H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):382-91. PubMed ID: 19109296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic aspects of implementing genomic evaluations in a pig sire line breeding scheme.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):40. PubMed ID: 24127883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic optimization of full-sib test group size and genotyping effort in a breeding program for Atlantic salmon.
    Janssen K; Saatkamp HW; Calus MPL; Komen H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):49. PubMed ID: 31481013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential benefits of genomic selection on genetic gain of small ruminant breeding programs.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3644-57. PubMed ID: 23736059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient use of genomic information for sustainable genetic improvement in small cattle populations.
    Obšteter J; Jenko J; Hickey JM; Gorjanc G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9971-9982. PubMed ID: 31477287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review: Opportunities and challenges for small populations of dairy cattle in the era of genomics.
    Schöpke K; Swalve HH
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 26957010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response to genomic selection: the Bulmer effect and the potential of genomic selection when the number of phenotypic records is limiting.
    Van Grevenhof EM; Van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):26. PubMed ID: 22862849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of female information in dairy cattle genomic breeding programs.
    Mc Hugh N; Meuwissen TH; Cromie AR; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4109-18. PubMed ID: 21787946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
    Howard JT; Rathje TA; Bruns CE; Wilson-Wells DF; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Nov; 96(11):4532-4542. PubMed ID: 30107560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimising multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes including genomic selection using decorrelated or optimum selection indices.
    Börner V; Reinsch N
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jan; 44(1):1. PubMed ID: 22252172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.