146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3368150)
1. The application of assessment techniques.
Fink CA
Nurs Manage; 1988 May; 19(5):66-8. PubMed ID: 3368150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A practical approach to performance appraisal.
Pressler EC
Manage World; 1978 Nov; 7(11):9-12. PubMed ID: 10239456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A critique of performance appraisal systems.
Yager E
Pers J; 1981 Feb; 60(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10249832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing a primary nursing performance appraisal tool.
Beck S
Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 2294492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Worker assessment in practice].
Ksykiewicz-Dorota A; Drygała M
Pieleg Polozna; 1983; (7):12-4, 22. PubMed ID: 6557572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Combing BARS and MBO6: using an appraisal system to diagnose performance problems.
Schneier CE; Beatty RW
Pers Adm; 1979 Sep; 24(9):51-60. PubMed ID: 10243666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple rater performance appraisals: solutions for hospital personnel.
Boissoneau RA; Edwards MR
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(2):54-66. PubMed ID: 10270712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: performance appraisal--Part IV.
Nauright L
Nurs Manage; 1987 Aug; 18(8):67-70, 75-7. PubMed ID: 3649657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Criterion referenced performance appraisal system: a blueprint.
Sudela KD; Landureth L
Nurs Manage; 1987 Mar; 18(3):54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 3645448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance evaluations.
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):vii-xvi, 1-160. PubMed ID: 2640597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Functions and techniques of employee evaluations.
Holt GA
Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1983; 5(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 10260704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. MBO--is it passé?
O'Donnell M; O'Donnell RJ
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1983; 28(5):46-58. PubMed ID: 10263880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Documentation evaluation system: streamlining quality of care and personnel evaluations.
Nadzam DM
Nurs Manage; 1987 Nov; 18(11):38-42. PubMed ID: 3684085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of charge nurses].
Nowomińska A
Pieleg Polozna; 1984; 9():9-10, 33. PubMed ID: 6570258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The manager's challenge.
Alexander GR
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):3-6. PubMed ID: 2640600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluating performance to guarantee a high standard].
Pins JA; Hardie CG
Rev Enferm; 1987 Dec; 10(112 Suppl):4-7. PubMed ID: 3438684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A model for evaluating the clinical skills of respiratory therapy personnel.
Block AS
Respir Care; 1978 Mar; 23(3):269-80. PubMed ID: 10314902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Making peer review work in the emergency setting: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience.
Hoelz JJ; Pieterick CL
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2640605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost accountability and clinical nurse specialist evaluation.
Tierney MJ; Grant LM; Mazique SI
Nurs Manage; 1990 May; 21(5):26-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 2110640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance appraisal is not enough.
Council JD; Plachy RJ
J Nurs Adm; 1980 Oct; 10(10):20-6. PubMed ID: 6903581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]