175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33682180)
1. Patient satisfaction and masticatory performance of zirconia bar compared to cobalt chromium bar retaining mandibular implant overdenture: A crossover study.
Altonbary GY; Emera RMK
J Oral Rehabil; 2021 Jul; 48(7):827-835. PubMed ID: 33682180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study.
Nabil MS; Mahanna FF; Said MM
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):672. PubMed ID: 38851676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of mandibular implant-retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency.
Farias Neto A; Pereira BM; Xitara RL; Germano AR; Ribeiro JA; Mestriner Junior W; Carreiro Ada F
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e650-5. PubMed ID: 21916952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Masticatory efficiency of implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with attachments compared with conventional dentures: an in vitro digital colorimetric image analysis.
Salami ZA; Jasser EM; Makzoumé JED; Boulos PJA
Gen Dent; 2020; 68(6):60-64. PubMed ID: 33136048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An implant-supported, cobalt-chromium milled bar and nonflanged attachment-retained overdenture to rehabilitate the edentulous mandible.
Lowe LG; Shcherbukhin VM
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 19573689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life for four implant-assisted mandibular overdentures fabricated with CAD/CAM milled poly methyl methacrylate, CAD/CAM-milled poly ether ether ketone, or conventional poly methyl methacrylate: A crossover clinical trial.
Gomaa AM; Mostafa AZH; El-Shaheed NH
J Oral Rehabil; 2023 Jul; 50(7):566-579. PubMed ID: 37002714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: evaluation of masticatory function.
Tang L; Lund JP; Taché R; Clokie CM; Feine JS
J Dent Res; 1999 Sep; 78(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 10512389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface Wear and Retention Force of Zirconia and PEKK Implant-retained Crowns.
Emera RMK; Askar O
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 32(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 37549130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri-implant tissues of bar-implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 1-year clinical and radiographical study.
Elsyad MA; Shoukouki AH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 May; 21(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 20443800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments.
Cune M; Burgers M; van Kampen F; de Putter C; van der Bilt A
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 20617218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reinforcement of Single Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture with a Cobalt-Chromium Framework before Implant Surgery.
Amaral CFD; Pinheiro MA; Rodrigues Garcia RCM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):844-848. PubMed ID: 29239054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of masticatory efficiency, clinical performance, and patient satisfaction of single implant-retained mandibular overdenture versus conventional complete denture: A prospective in vivo study.
Mathew JE; Kurian N; Gandhi N; Daniel AY; Roy N; Varghese KG
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Jan; 24(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 38263559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments.
Cheng T; Sun G; Huo J; He X; Wang Y; Ren YF
J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):1018-23. PubMed ID: 22925922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 3-D Finite Element Analysis of a Single Implant Retained Overdenture Reinforced with Short Versus Long Frameworks.
El-Okl AB; Abou Neel EA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 May; 29(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 33393743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Mean Bite Force and Masticatory Performance of Maxillary and Mandibular Complete Dentures vs Mandibular Implant-supported Over Denture.
Kumar A; Karthik KVGC; Sunkala L; Bejagam V; Rathore KK; Rai P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 May; 23(5):513-519. PubMed ID: 35986459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Different Attachments Used for Implant-Retained Overdentures in Subjects with Resorbed Mandibles: A Crossover Trial.
Mahanna FF; Elsyad MA; Mourad SI; Abozaed HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 32142580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
