These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33682208)

  • 21. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hearing speech sounds: top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception.
    Davis MH; Johnsrude IS
    Hear Res; 2007 Jul; 229(1-2):132-47. PubMed ID: 17317056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stimulus-directed attention attenuates lexically-guided perceptual learning.
    McAuliffe M; Babel M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1727. PubMed ID: 27914402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing.
    Choi JY; Hu ER; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):784-797. PubMed ID: 29417449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Short-term exposure to one dialect affects processing of another.
    Hay J; Drager K; Warren P
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 4):447-71. PubMed ID: 21313989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term priors constrain category learning in the context of short-term statistical regularities.
    Roark CL; Holt LL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1925-1937. PubMed ID: 35524011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing lexically guided perceptual learning in younger and older listeners.
    Scharenborg O; Janse E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 23354594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.
    Miller JL; Volaitis LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Dec; 46(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 2587179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Individual Differences in Lexical Contributions to Speech Perception.
    Giovannone N; Theodore RM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 64(3):707-724. PubMed ID: 33606960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Listeners are initially flexible in updating phonetic beliefs over time.
    Saltzman D; Myers E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1354-1364. PubMed ID: 33742423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accommodating variation: dialects, idiolects, and speech processing.
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE; Samuel AG
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):54-81. PubMed ID: 17803986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lexically guided perceptual tuning of internal phonetic category structure.
    Drouin JR; Theodore RM; Myers EB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):EL307. PubMed ID: 27794292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech.
    Brodbeck C; Hong LE; Simon JZ
    Curr Biol; 2018 Dec; 28(24):3976-3983.e5. PubMed ID: 30503620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages.
    Reinisch E; Weber A; Mitterer H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22545600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information.
    van Linden S; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1483-94. PubMed ID: 18085958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does Signal Degradation Affect Top-Down Processing of Speech?
    Wagner A; Pals C; de Blecourt CM; Sarampalis A; Başkent D
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():297-306. PubMed ID: 27080670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception.
    Polka L
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jul; 52(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 1635856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries.
    Mattys SL; Melhorn JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):554-67. PubMed ID: 17614511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An ERP investigation of regional and foreign accent processing.
    Goslin J; Duffy H; Floccia C
    Brain Lang; 2012 Aug; 122(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 22694999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.