607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33682426)
1. Meta-Analysis of Stroke and Mortality Rates in Patients Undergoing Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Macherey S; Meertens M; Mauri V; Frerker C; Adam M; Baldus S; Schmidt T
J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 Mar; 10(6):e019512. PubMed ID: 33682426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.
Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Renal outcomes in valve-in-valve transcatheter versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arjomandi Rad A; Naruka V; Vardanyan R; Salmasi MY; Tasoudis PT; Kendall S; Casula R; Athanasiou T
J Card Surg; 2022 Nov; 37(11):3743-3753. PubMed ID: 36040611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Sá MPBO; Van den Eynde J; Simonato M; Cavalcanti LRP; Doulamis IP; Weixler V; Kampaktsis PN; Gallo M; Laforgia PL; Zhigalov K; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Pibarot P; Clavel MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 14(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 33478639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valve-in-Surgical-Valve With SAPIEN 3 for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Based on Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality.
Kaneko T; Makkar RR; Krishnaswami A; Hermiller J; Greenbaum A; Babaliaros V; Shah PB; Bailey SH; Bapat V; Kapadia S; Abbas AE
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 May; 14(5):e010288. PubMed ID: 34003666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahmed A; Levy KH
J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-Year Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Using New-Generation Transcatheter Devices Compared With Redo-SAVR.
Nagasaka T; Koren O; Patel V; Naami R; Naami E; Shechter A; Kohan S; Allison Z; Lerner A; Cheng DE; Chakravarty T; Cheng W; Jilaihawi H; Ishii H; Nakamura M; Makkar RR
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 207():380-389. PubMed ID: 37778227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable valves: a registry study.
Makkar RR; Kapadia S; Chakravarty T; Cubeddu RJ; Kaneko T; Mahoney P; Patel D; Gupta A; Cheng W; Kodali S; Bhatt DL; Mack MJ; Leon MB; Thourani VH
Lancet; 2023 Oct; 402(10412):1529-1540. PubMed ID: 37660719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement of Failed Surgically Implanted Bioprostheses: The STS/ACC Registry.
Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR; Vemulapalli S; Carroll JD; Holmes DR; Mack MJ; Thourani VH; Grover FL; Brennan JM; Suri RM; Dai D; Svensson LG
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(4):370-382. PubMed ID: 30025572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Aortic Valve Replacement as an Alternative to Surgical Re-Replacement.
Deharo P; Bisson A; Herbert J; Lacour T; Etienne CS; Porto A; Theron A; Collart F; Bourguignon T; Cuisset T; Fauchier L
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 76(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 32731926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus Stented Bioprostheses.
Duncan A; Moat N; Simonato M; de Weger A; Kempfert J; Eggebrecht H; Walton A; Hellig F; Kornowski R; Spargias K; Mendiz O; Makkar R; Guerrero M; Rihal C; George I; Don C; Iadanza A; Bapat V; Welsh R; Wijeysundera HC; Wood D; Sathananthan J; Danenberg H; Maisano F; Garcia S; Gafoor S; Nombela-Franco L; Cobiella J; Dvir D
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(13):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 31202944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes.
Hirji SA; Percy ED; Zogg CK; Malarczyk A; Harloff MT; Yazdchi F; Kaneko T
Eur Heart J; 2020 Aug; 41(29):2747-2755. PubMed ID: 32445575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Redo-aortic valve replacement in prior stentless prosthetic aortic valves: Transcatheter versus surgical approach.
Choi CH; Cao K; Malaver D; Kincaid EH; Lata A; Kon N; Belford PM; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 34402588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does valve in valve TAVR carry a higher risk for thromboembolic events compared to native valve TAVR?
Eitan A; Brinkmann C; Haselbach T; Witt J; Schofer J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 95(5):1017-1021. PubMed ID: 31290241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Valve-in-Valve TAVR versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Early Outcomes.
Cizmic A; Kuhn E; Eghbalzadeh K; Weber C; Rahmanian PB; Adam M; Mauri V; Rudolph T; Baldus S; Wahlers T
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Mar; 71(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 34521136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
