These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33682930)

  • 1. Comparing footwear impressions that are close non-matches using correlation-based approaches.
    Venkatasubramanian G; Hegde V; Padi S; Iyer H; Herman M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):890-909. PubMed ID: 33682930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative assessment of similarity between randomly acquired characteristics on high quality exemplars and crime scene impressions via analysis of feature size and shape.
    Richetelli N; Nobel M; Bodziak WJ; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():211-222. PubMed ID: 27838107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical note: The Next Step - a semi-automatic coding and comparison system for forensic footwear impressions.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Pertsev R; Issan Y; Pasternak Z; Cohen A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111378. PubMed ID: 35839684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative evaluation of footwear evidence: Initial workflow for an end-to-end system.
    Venkatasubramanian G; Hegde V; Lund SP; Iyer H; Herman M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2232-2251. PubMed ID: 34374992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation and comparison of the electrostatic dust print lifter and the electrostatic detection apparatus on the development of footwear impressions on paper.
    Craig CL; Hornsby BM; Riles M
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):819-26. PubMed ID: 16882226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method for the recovery and evidential comparison of footwear impressions using 3D structured light scanning.
    Thompson TJU; Norris P
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 29685306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Various Fixatives for Casting Footwear Impressions in Sand at Crime Scenes.
    Battiest T; Clutter SW; McGill D
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 May; 61(3):782-6. PubMed ID: 27122420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in footwear: Part I - Impressions in blood.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):117-133. PubMed ID: 38182307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-dimensional metric comparisons between dynamic bare footprints and insole foot impressions-forensic implications.
    Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 32111287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in footwear: Part II - Impressions in dust.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):134-150. PubMed ID: 38182308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of image descriptors on the performance of classifiers of footwear outsole image pairs.
    Park S; Carriquiry A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Feb; 331():111126. PubMed ID: 34922283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A metric study of insole foot impressions in footwear of identical twins.
    Nirenberg MS; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Nov; 52():116-121. PubMed ID: 28918370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inherent variation in multiple shoe-sole test impressions.
    Shor Y; Wiesner S; Tsach T; Gurel R; Yekutieli Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Apr; 285():189-203. PubMed ID: 29428777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simulated crime scene footwear impression database for teaching and research purposes.
    Lin ET; DeBat T; Speir JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):726-734. PubMed ID: 34750820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A database of two-dimensional images of footwear outsole impressions.
    Park S; Carriquiry A
    Data Brief; 2020 Jun; 30():105508. PubMed ID: 32322634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the quality of footwear marks recovered from simulated graves.
    Stephens M; Errickson D; Giles SB; Ringrose TJ
    Sci Justice; 2020 Nov; 60(6):512-521. PubMed ID: 33077034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shoeprint image retrieval and crime scene shoeprint image linking by using convolutional neural network and normalized cross correlation.
    Wen Z; Curran JM; Wevers G
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jul; 63(4):439-450. PubMed ID: 37453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crime scene reconstruction-Sex prediction from blood stained foot sole impressions.
    Basu N; Bandyopadhyay SK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():156-172. PubMed ID: 28734269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical discrimination of footwear: a method for the comparison of accidentals on shoe outsoles inspired by facial recognition techniques.
    Petraco ND; Gambino C; Kubic TA; Olivio D; Petraco N
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 19895540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Location distribution of randomly acquired characteristics on a shoe sole.
    Kaplan-Damary N; Mandel M; Yekutieli Y; Shor Y; Wiesner S
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Sep; 67(5):1801-1809. PubMed ID: 35855550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.