These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33683711)

  • 21. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part II - Microscopic scales.
    Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 38146824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients.
    Tseng HW; Karellas A; Vedantham S
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1406-1417. PubMed ID: 36427332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Advances in digital and physical anthropomorphic breast phantoms for x-ray imaging.
    Glick SJ; Ikejimba LC
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):e870-e885. PubMed ID: 30058117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Homogeneous vs. patient specific breast models for Monte Carlo evaluation of mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Bliznakova K; Sechopoulos I; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():56-63. PubMed ID: 29705184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Generation of a suite of 3D computer-generated breast phantoms from a limited set of human subject data.
    Hsu CM; Palmeri ML; Segars WP; Veress AI; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):043703. PubMed ID: 23556929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Technical note: MC-GPU breast dosimetry validations with other Monte Carlo codes and phase space file implementation.
    Massera RT; Thomson RM; Tomal A
    Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):244-253. PubMed ID: 34778988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and dedicated breast CT.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Tucciariello RM; Bliznakova K; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():142-148. PubMed ID: 30314732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiation doses in cone-beam breast computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Yi Y; Lai CJ; Han T; Zhong Y; Shen Y; Liu X; Ge S; You Z; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 21452696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Generative compressed breast shape model for digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Pinto MC; Michielsen K; Biniazan R; Kappler S; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2023 May; 50(5):2928-2938. PubMed ID: 36433824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data.
    Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Young KC; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ; Schopphoven S; Jeukens CR; Veldkamp WJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7893-907. PubMed ID: 26407015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant-geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms.
    Hernandez AM; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 28715130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. INDIVIDUALISED CALCULATION OF TISSUE IMPARTED ENERGY IN BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS.
    Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):267-73. PubMed ID: 27127209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom.
    Lau BA; Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Bakic PR
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3375-85. PubMed ID: 22755718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Virtual dosimetry study with three cone-beam breast computed tomography scanners using a fast GPU-based Monte Carlo code.
    Mettivier G; Lai Y; Jia X; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(4):. PubMed ID: 38237186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76. PubMed ID: 17388174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. THUBreast: an open-source breast phantom generation software for x-ray imaging and dosimetry.
    Wang J; Liu Y; Hu A; Wu Z; Zhang H; Li J; Qiu R
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Mar; 69(6):. PubMed ID: 38346343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.