134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33684070)
1. Setting Scottish diagnostic reference levels for mammography incorporating both craniocaudal and oblique projections between 30 and 80 mm.
Weir A; Schofield KA; McCurrach A
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Feb; 41(1):. PubMed ID: 33684070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography: Two hospitals study in northwest, Nigeria.
Garba I; Bashir HS; Bello F; Nuhu KS; Mohammed S; Mansur Y; Lawal Y
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 33896746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in New South Wales.
Suleiman ME; McEntee MF; Cartwright L; Diffey J; Brennan PC
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Feb; 61(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 27714925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed DRLs for mammography in Switzerland.
Dupont L; Aberle C; Botsikas D; Ith M; Lima TVM; Menz R; Monnin P; Poletti PA; Presilla S; Schegerer A; Stoica LC; Trueb P; Sans Merce M
J Radiol Prot; 2024 May; 44(2):. PubMed ID: 38530290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) in Ghana.
Dzidzornu E; Angmorterh SK; Ofori-Manteaw BB; Aboagye S; Dzefi-Tettey K; Ofori EK
Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):611-616. PubMed ID: 33342686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glandular doses and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for Saudi breast cancer screening programme (2012-2021).
Albeshan SM; Alhulail AA; Almuqbil MM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Apr; 200(5):467-472. PubMed ID: 38324508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishment of regional diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in Western Province of Sri Lanka.
Niroshani HS; Jeyasugiththan J; Senanayake G; Negishi T
J Radiol Prot; 2021 Feb; 41(1):. PubMed ID: 33271512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dose to breast during digital mammography in Tanzania.
Edmund E; Kamuzora M; Muhogora W; Ngoya P; Muhulo A; Amirali A; Makoba A; Ngoye W; Ngaile J; Majatta S; Ngulimi M; Mwambinga S; Kaijage T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Mar; 200(4):409-416. PubMed ID: 38196028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in patient dose and compression force for digital (DR) mammography systems over an eleven-year period.
Ramnarain J; Cartwright L; Diffey J
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 47(1):215-222. PubMed ID: 38019445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose management software implementation in mammography.
Samara ET; Tsapaki V; Sramek D
Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():88-95. PubMed ID: 31765886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Mammography in Dubai.
Abdulwahid Noor K; Mohd Norsuddin N; Abdul Karim MK; Che Isa IN; Alshamsi W
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38201317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A survey on mean glandular dose in mammography examination and the factors affecting it in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran.
Asadollahzadeh N; Razavi S; Zare MH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Jun; 200(9):809-821. PubMed ID: 38811346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.
Jamal N; Ng KH; McLean D
Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):238-45. PubMed ID: 12711643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Establishing national diagnostic reference levels in radiography, mammography, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry services in Ireland and comparing these with European diagnostic reference levels.
O'Hora L; Neville N; Tuffy J; Craig A; O'Brien K; Sugrue K; McGarry M; Duggan B; Egan S
Eur Radiol; 2023 Dec; 33(12):9469-9478. PubMed ID: 37505250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation doses in the United Kingdom breast screening programmes 2016-2019.
Loveland J; Young KC; Oduko JM; Mackenzie A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 95(1135):20211400. PubMed ID: 35604717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New diagnostic reference level for full-field digital mammography units.
Hauge IH; Bredholt K; Olerud HM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 23771960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards proposition of a diagnostic reference level for mammographic examination in the greater Khorasan Province, Iran.
Bahreyni Toossi MT; Zare H; Bayani Roodi Sh; Hashemi M; Akbari F; Malekzadeh M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 23209184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants.
Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Correa RS; Peixoto JE; Almeida CD; Rodrigues DCN; Glassman LM; Soares LR
J Radiol Prot; 2019 Apr; 39(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 30812019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of mean glandular dose in a full-field digital mammography unit in Tabriz, Iran.
Alizadeh Riabi H; Mehnati P; Mesbahi A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):222-7. PubMed ID: 20823039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regression Analysis between the Different Breast Dose Quantities Reported in Digital Mammography and Patient Age, Breast Thickness, and Acquisition Parameters.
Dhou S; Dalah E; AlGhafeer R; Hamidu A; Obaideen A
J Imaging; 2022 Jul; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
