188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33684233)
1. Log ODDS (LODDS) of positive lymph nodes as a predictor of overall survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
Patel KN; Salunke A; Bhatt S; Sharma M; Jain A; Puj K; Rathod P; Warikoo V; Pandya SJ
J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 123(8):1836-1844. PubMed ID: 33684233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of different lymph node staging systems in patients with positive lymph nodes in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Lin NC; Su IH; Hsu JT; Chang YJ; Tsai KY
Oral Oncol; 2021 Mar; 114():105146. PubMed ID: 33465680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy.
Jian-Hui C; Shi-Rong C; Hui W; Si-le C; Jian-Bo X; Er-Tao Z; Chuang-Qi C; Yu-Long H
Tumour Biol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):11105-13. PubMed ID: 26912060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of log odds of positive lymph nodes in patients with resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Jin W; Zhu Z; Wu Y; Ding X; Wu H; Song X; Wu Y
Oral Oncol; 2020 Sep; 108():104709. PubMed ID: 32535340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Prognostic Ability of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Lee CC; Ho HC; Su YC; Lee MS; Hung SK; Chen YL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Jul; 94(27):e1069. PubMed ID: 26166079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of lymph node density in buccal squamous cell carcinoma.
Chow TL; Kwan WWY; Fung SC; Ho LI
Am J Otolaryngol; 2017; 38(5):529-532. PubMed ID: 28554580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy using the log odds of positive lymph nodes.
Wu SG; Sun JY; Yang LC; Zhou J; Li FY; Li Q; Lin HX; Lin Q; He ZY
Oncotarget; 2015 Nov; 6(34):36911-22. PubMed ID: 26426993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in predicting overall survival for gastric cancer patients after radical resection].
Luo C; Zhang G; Wang W; Zhou Z; Zhang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 19(10):1107-1112. PubMed ID: 27781245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disease-specific survival after radical lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: prediction by lymph node count and density.
Li ZS; Yao K; Chen P; Zou ZJ; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Li YH; Zhou FJ; Han H
Urol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 32(6):893-900. PubMed ID: 24994488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive analysis of prognostic value of lymph node staging classifications in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after cervical lymph node dissection.
Wen J; Wei Y; Jabbour SK; Xu T; Wang Y; Chen J; Wang J; Hu C; Su F; Fan M; Zhang Z; Lu X
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1710-1717. PubMed ID: 33549377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Different lymph node staging systems in patients with gastric cancer from Korean: What is the best prognostic assessment tool?
Lee JW; Ali B; Park CH; Song KY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jun; 95(25):e3860. PubMed ID: 27336871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Predictive value of log odds of positive lymph nodes for the prognosis of patients with node-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after radical esophagectomy].
Yang M; Zhang H; Huo X; Chen C; Yu Z
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May; 19(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 27215521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) for prognostic prediction after gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 7620 patients in China.
Gu P; Deng J; Sun Z; Wang Z; Wang W; Liang H; Xu H; Zhou Z
Surg Today; 2021 Jan; 51(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 32754844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three lymph node staging schemes for predicting the outcome in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma: A population-based cohort and international multicentre cohort study.
Zhou YY; Du XJ; Zhang CH; Aparicio T; Zaanan A; Afchain P; Chen LP; Hu SK; Zhang PC; Wu M; Zhang QW; Wang H
EBioMedicine; 2019 Mar; 41():276-285. PubMed ID: 30824384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the most accurate lymph node staging method for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? Comparison of UICC/AJCC pN stage, number of metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes.
Conci S; Ruzzenente A; Sandri M; Bertuzzo F; Campagnaro T; Bagante F; Capelli P; D'Onofrio M; Piccino M; Dorna AE; Pedrazzani C; Iacono C; Guglielmi A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):743-750. PubMed ID: 28094085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 4 lymph node staging systems for the prognostic prediction of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes.
Yang Y; Zheng J; Li Y
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 48(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 34876328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes (LODDS) as an Independent Predictor of Overall Survival Following Radical Cystectomy in Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Time to Rethink Conventional Node Staging.
Salari A; Ghahari M; Nowroozi A; Ghahari P; Haddad M; Sahebi L; Ayati M; Momeni SA; Nowroozi MR; Amini E
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2023 Jun; 21(3):e175-e181. PubMed ID: 36567241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic assessment of different metastatic lymph node staging methods for gastric cancer after D2 resection.
Xu J; Bian YH; Jin X; Cao H
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Mar; 19(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 23569344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of log odds of positive lymph nodes in node-positive lung squamous cell carcinoma patients after surgery: a SEER population-based study.
Yu Y; Zhang P; Yao R; Wang J; Wang P; Xue X; Xiao J; Wang Z
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2020 Aug; 9(4):1285-1301. PubMed ID: 32953505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in evaluating the prognosis of patients with pT3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Liu DT; Wang LS; Chen YP; Chen SB
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17161. PubMed ID: 33051518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
