BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33684373)

  • 1. In-Hospital Utilization and Outcomes of Palliative Care Consultation in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Grant JK; Vincent L; Ebner B; Singh H; Maning J; Olorunfemi O; Olarte NI; Zablah G; Zaw K; Colombo R
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 148():94-101. PubMed ID: 33684373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obesity and Outcomes Following Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Sreenivasan J; Khan MS; Sharedalal P; Hooda U; Fudim M; Demmer RT; Yuzefpolskaya M; Ahmad H; Khan SS; Lanier GM; Colombo PC; Rich JD
    Circ Heart Fail; 2021 Mar; 14(3):e007937. PubMed ID: 33706552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Enezate T; Eniezat M; Thomas J
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 124(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 31204034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardiogenic shock during heart failure hospitalizations: Age-, sex-, and race-stratified trends in incidence and outcomes.
    Yandrapalli S; Sanaani A; Harikrishnan P; Aronow WS; Frishman WH; Lanier GM; Ahmed A; Fonarow GC
    Am Heart J; 2019 Jul; 213():18-29. PubMed ID: 31078113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Outcomes Associated With Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Utilization in Heart Failure Related Cardiogenic Shock.
    Hernandez-Montfort J; Sinha SS; Thayer KL; Whitehead EH; Pahuja M; Garan AR; Mahr C; Haywood JL; Harwani NM; Schaeffer A; Wencker D; Kanwar M; Vorovich E; Abraham J; Burkhoff D; Kapur NK
    Circ Heart Fail; 2021 May; 14(5):e007924. PubMed ID: 33905259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender Differences in the Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Bravo-Jaimes K; Mejia MO; Abelhad NI; Zhou Y; Jumean MF; Nathan S; Dhoble A
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 Jul; 174():20-26. PubMed ID: 35469654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiogenic shock: incidence, survival and mechanical circulatory support usage 2007-2017-insights from a national registry.
    Lang CN; Kaier K; Zotzmann V; Stachon P; Pottgiesser T; von Zur Muehlen C; Zehender M; Duerschmied D; Schmid B; Bode C; Wengenmayer T; Staudacher DL
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 110(9):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 33258007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Cohen DJ; Yeh RW
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007270. PubMed ID: 30608880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends and Impact of the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy.
    Napierkowski S; Banerjee U; Anderson HV; Charitakis K; Madjid M; Smalling RW; Dhoble A
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Jan; 139():28-33. PubMed ID: 33035466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Yeh RW
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Apr; 13(18):e2152-e2159. PubMed ID: 29400657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Palliative care referral in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Ando T; Akintoye E; Uemura T; Adegbala O; Ashraf S; Pahuja M; Shokr M; Takagi H; Grines CL; Afonso L; Briasoulis A
    Heart Lung; 2020; 49(1):25-29. PubMed ID: 31703953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Postcardiac Surgery Cardiogenic Shock.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Arora S; Sakhuja A; Lahewala S; Kumar V; Shantha GPS; Egbe AC; Stulak JM; Gersh BJ; Gulati R; Rihal CS; Prasad A; Deshmukh AJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 123(3):489-497. PubMed ID: 30473325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.
    Alasnag M; Truesdell AG; Williams H; Martinez SC; Qadri SK; Skendelas JP; Jakobleff WA; Alasnag M
    Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2020 Apr; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 32328843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Outcomes Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Admitted on Weekends Versus Weekdays.
    Harhash AA; Kennedy KF; Fendler TJ; Khumri TM; Nassif ME; Magalski A; Sperry BW
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Apr; 144():20-25. PubMed ID: 33417875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency of Management of Cardiogenic Shock With Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices According to Race.
    Kim Y; Park J; Essa M; Lansky AJ; Sugeng L
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 125(12):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 32471549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiogenic Shock in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: An 8-Year National Perspective on Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Dunlay SM; Murphree DH; Barsness GW; Sandhu GS; Lerman A; Prasad A
    JACC Heart Fail; 2019 Jun; 7(6):469-476. PubMed ID: 31078481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical Circulatory Support in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the United States (from the National Inpatient Sample).
    Alkhalil A; Hajjar R; Ibrahim H; Ruiz CE
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 124(10):1615-1620. PubMed ID: 31522773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.