These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33684845)

  • 1. Measuring calibration of likelihood-ratio systems: A comparison of four metrics, including a new metric devPAV.
    Vergeer P; van Schaik Y; Sjerps M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110722. PubMed ID: 33684845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'Low' LRs obtained from DNA mixtures: On calibration and discrimination performance of probabilistic genotyping software.
    McCarthy-Allen M; Bleka Ø; Ypma R; Gill P; Benschop C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 73():103099. PubMed ID: 39089059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An overview of log likelihood ratio cost in forensic science - Where is it used and what values can we expect?
    van Lierop S; Ramos D; Sjerps M; Ypma R
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2024; 8():100466. PubMed ID: 38645839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In the context of forensic casework, are there meaningful metrics of the degree of calibration?
    Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2021; 3():100157. PubMed ID: 34179740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliable support: Measuring calibration of likelihood ratios.
    Ramos D; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):156-69. PubMed ID: 23664798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical likelihood ratios outputted by LR systems are often based on extrapolation: When to stop extrapolating?
    Vergeer P; van Es A; de Jongh A; Alberink I; Stoel R
    Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):482-491. PubMed ID: 27914556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation and assessment of a likelihood ratio approach for the evaluation of LA-ICP-MS evidence in forensic glass analysis.
    van Es A; Wiarda W; Hordijk M; Alberink I; Vergeer P
    Sci Justice; 2017 May; 57(3):181-192. PubMed ID: 28454627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information-theoretical assessment of the performance of likelihood ratio computation methods.
    Ramos D; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J; Zadora G; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1503-18. PubMed ID: 23879526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design, calibration and validation of a novel 3D printed instrumented spatial linkage that measures changes in the rotational axes of the tibiofemoral joint.
    Bonny DP; Hull ML; Howell SM
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Jan; 136(1):011003. PubMed ID: 24064860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why calibrating LR-systems is best practice. A reaction to "The evaluation of evidence for microspectrophotometry data using functional data analysis", in FSI 305.
    Vergeer P; Alberink I; Sjerps M; Ypma R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Sep; 314():110388. PubMed ID: 32663721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Likelihood ratio data to report the validation of a forensic fingerprint evaluation method.
    Ramos D; Haraksim R; Meuwly D
    Data Brief; 2017 Feb; 10():75-92. PubMed ID: 27981197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strength of linguistic text evidence: A fused forensic text comparison system.
    Ishihara S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():184-197. PubMed ID: 28735218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated face recognition in forensic science: Review and perspectives.
    Jacquet M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110124. PubMed ID: 31927397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance Study of a Score-based Likelihood Ratio System for Forensic Fingermark Comparison.
    Leegwater AJ; Meuwly D; Sjerps M; Vergeer P; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):626-640. PubMed ID: 28168685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems.
    Morrison GS
    Sci Justice; 2011 Sep; 51(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21889105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved likelihood ratios for face recognition in surveillance video by multimodal feature pairing.
    Macarulla Rodriguez A; Geradts Z; Worring M; Unzueta L
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2024; 8():100458. PubMed ID: 38487302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Likelihood ratio estimation for authorship text evidence: An empirical comparison of score- and feature-based methods.
    Ishihara S; Carne M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111268. PubMed ID: 35334288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Six Phase Encoding Based Susceptibility Distortion Correction Methods for Diffusion MRI.
    Gu X; Eklund A
    Front Neuroinform; 2019; 13():76. PubMed ID: 31866847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Score-based likelihood ratios for linguistic text evidence with a bag-of-words model.
    Ishihara S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110980. PubMed ID: 34481115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation.
    Meuwly D; Ramos D; Haraksim R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():142-153. PubMed ID: 27181589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.