These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33684845)

  • 21. Calibration of score based likelihood ratio estimation in automated forensic facial image comparison.
    Rodriguez AM; Geradts Z; Worring M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 May; 334():111239. PubMed ID: 35364422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of LA-ICP-MS databases to calculate likelihood ratios for the forensic analysis of glass evidence.
    Corzo R; Hoffman T; Weis P; Franco-Pedroso J; Ramos D; Almirall J
    Talanta; 2018 Aug; 186():655-661. PubMed ID: 29784417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rules versus layers: which side wins the battle of model calibration?
    Sakieh Y; Salmanmahiny A; Mirkarimi SH
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Nov; 188(11):633. PubMed ID: 27771873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.
    Swaminathan H; Qureshi MO; Grgicak CM; Duffy K; Lun DS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207599. PubMed ID: 30458020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance metrics for models designed to predict treatment effect.
    Maas CCHM; Kent DM; Hughes MC; Dekker R; Lingsma HF; van Klaveren D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):165. PubMed ID: 37422647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Likelihood ratio and posterior odds in forensic genetics: Two sides of the same coin.
    Caliebe A; Walsh S; Liu F; Kayser M; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():203-210. PubMed ID: 28314239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multi-element comparisons of tapes evidence using dimensionality reduction for calculating likelihood ratios.
    Gupta A; Martinez-Lopez C; Curran JM; Almirall JR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():426-434. PubMed ID: 31229846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. From data to a validated score-based LR system: A practitioner's guide.
    Leegwater AJ; Vergeer P; Alberink I; van der Ham LV; van de Wetering J; El Harchaoui R; Bosma W; Ypma RJF; Sjerps MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Apr; 357():111994. PubMed ID: 38522325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development and evaluation of aperture-based complexity metrics using film and EPID measurements of static MLC openings.
    Götstedt J; Karlsson Hauer A; Bäck A
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3911-21. PubMed ID: 26133592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Roza: a new and comprehensive metric for evaluating classification systems.
    Melek M; Melek N
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Jul; 25(9):1015-1027. PubMed ID: 34693834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does the SORG Algorithm Predict 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma? An External Validation.
    Bongers MER; Thio QCBS; Karhade AV; Stor ML; Raskin KA; Lozano Calderon SA; DeLaney TF; Ferrone ML; Schwab JH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 477(10):2296-2303. PubMed ID: 31107338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated multi-objective calibration of biological agent-based simulations.
    Read MN; Alden K; Rose LM; Timmis J
    J R Soc Interface; 2016 Sep; 13(122):. PubMed ID: 27628175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A meta-analysis of asbestos-related cancer risk that addresses fiber size and mineral type.
    Berman DW; Crump KS
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():49-73. PubMed ID: 18686078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of metric precision for a riparian forest survey.
    Barker JR; Bollman M; Ringold PL; Sackinger J; Cline SP
    Environ Monit Assess; 2002 Apr; 75(1):51-72. PubMed ID: 15900665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Likelihood ratio distributions and the (ir)relevance of error rates.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102173. PubMed ID: 31670022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated comparison and evaluation of striated cutting plier toolmarks on metal wires.
    Patteet JA; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Sep; 364():112239. PubMed ID: 39362175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT) to the metric of traditional headache scales.
    Bjorner JB; Kosinski M; Ware JE
    Qual Life Res; 2003 Dec; 12(8):981-1002. PubMed ID: 14651417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
    Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.