206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33685388)
1. The relationship between breast density, age, and mammographic lesion type among Chinese breast cancer patients from a large clinical dataset.
Ji Y; Li B; Zhao R; Zhang Y; Liu J; Lu H
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Mar; 21(1):43. PubMed ID: 33685388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The implications of increased mammographic breast density for breast screening in Jordan.
Al-Mousa DS; Alakhras M; Spuur KM; Alewaidat H; Abdelrahman M; Rawashdeh M; Brennan PC
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):277-283. PubMed ID: 32578380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists.
Lee AY; Wisner DJ; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Arasu VA; Feig SA; Hargreaves J; Ojeda-Fournier H; Bassett LW; Wells CJ; De Guzman J; Flowers CI; Campbell JE; Elson SL; Retallack H; Joe BN
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 27793579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital.
Noonpradej S; Wangkulangkul P; Woodtichartpreecha P; Laohawiriyakamol S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Feb; 22(2):531-536. PubMed ID: 33639670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior breast cancer - mammographic and ultrasonographic features.
Janković A; Nadrljanski M; Karapandzić VP; Ivanović N; Radojicić Z; Milosević Z
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Nov; 70(11):1034-8. PubMed ID: 24397199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Mammographic, Radiologist, and Patient Factors on the Likelihood of Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Assessment at Diagnostic Mammography.
Chesebro AL; Abbasi N; Lacson R; Chikarmane SA; Licaros ARL; Giess CS
J Breast Imaging; 2024 May; 6(3):246-253. PubMed ID: 38655858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reported mammographic density: film-screen versus digital acquisition.
Harvey JA; Gard CC; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Geller BA; Onega TL;
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):752-8. PubMed ID: 23249570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer risk prediction model: a nomogram based on common mammographic screening findings.
Timmers JM; Verbeek AL; IntHout J; Pijnappel RM; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2413-9. PubMed ID: 23591619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential Use of American College of Radiology BI-RADS Mammography Atlas for Reporting and Assessing Lesions Detected on Dedicated Breast CT Imaging: Preliminary Study.
Jung HK; Kuzmiak CM; Kim KW; Choi NM; Kim HJ; Langman EL; Yoon S; Steen D; Zeng D; Gao F
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1395-1401. PubMed ID: 28728854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography.
Cubuk R; Tasali N; Narin B; Keskiner F; Celik L; Guney S
Radiol Med; 2010 Apr; 115(3):434-41. PubMed ID: 20082222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of the BI-RADS assessment categories of Papua New Guinean women with mammographic parenchymal patterns, age and diagnosis.
Pape R; Spuur KM; Wilkinson JM; Umo P
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):269-276. PubMed ID: 32936540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes?
Posso M; Louro J; Sánchez M; Román M; Vidal C; Sala M; Baré M; Castells X;
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():81-87. PubMed ID: 30599878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation.
Gard CC; Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Taplin SH; Rutter CM
Breast J; 2015; 21(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 26133090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are breast density and bone mineral density independent risk factors for breast cancer?
Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J; Creasman J; Tice JA; Ziv E; Cummings SR
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 15741573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of mammographic breast density in a group of screening chinese women and breast cancer patients.
Liu J; Liu PF; Li JN; Qing C; Ji Y; Hao XS; Zhang XN
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(15):6411-4. PubMed ID: 25124634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging and Histopathologic Features of BI-RADS 3 Lesions Upgraded during Imaging Surveillance.
Michaels A; Chung CS; Birdwell RL; Frost EP; Giess CS
Breast J; 2017 Jan; 23(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 27612001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
