These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33685654)

  • 1. Effects of implant diameter, implant-abutment connection type, and bone density on the biomechanical stability of implant components and bone: A finite element analysis study.
    Lee H; Jo M; Sailer I; Noh G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):716-728. PubMed ID: 33685654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
    Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible.
    Lee H; Park S; Noh G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):659-670. PubMed ID: 30580986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis.
    Nie H; Tang Y; Yang Y; Wu W; Zhou W; Liu Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):277. PubMed ID: 37170117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis on Stress Distribution of Internal Implant-Abutment Engagement Features.
    Cho SY; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 29534119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical effects of dental implant diameter, connection type, and bone density on microgap formation and fatigue failure: A finite element analysis.
    Lee H; Jo M; Noh G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Mar; 200():105863. PubMed ID: 33308905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
    Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
    Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of gingival height of a titanium base on the biomechanical behavior of 2-piece custom implant abutments: A 3-dimensional nonlinear finite element study.
    Poovarodom P; Rungsiyakull C; Suriyawanakul J; Li Q; Sasaki K; Yoda N; Rungsiyakull P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):380.e1-380.e9. PubMed ID: 37482534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of bone quality and bone loss level around internal and external connection implants: A finite element analysis study.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT; Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):137.e1-137.e10. PubMed ID: 33139058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of different design of abutment and implant on stress distribution in 2 implants and peripheral bone: A finite element analysis study.
    Kul E; Korkmaz İH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):664.e1-664.e9. PubMed ID: 33573834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
    de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
    Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analyzing the effects of the platform-switching procedure on stresses in the bone and implant-abutment complex by 3-dimensional fem analysis.
    Cimen H; Yengin E
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Feb; 38(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 20662671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Abutment Design on Stress Distribution in Narrow Implants with Marginal Bone Loss: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Yenigun S; Ercal P; Ozden-Yenigun E; Katiboglu AB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(4):640-649. PubMed ID: 34411203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.