These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33686723)

  • 1. Short communication: Cemented implant reconstructions are associated with less marginal bone loss than screw-retained reconstructions at 3 and 5 years of loading.
    Strauss FJ; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 May; 32(5):651-656. PubMed ID: 33686723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peri-implant conditions and marginal bone loss around cemented and screw-retained single implant crowns in posterior regions: A retrospective cohort study with up to 4 years follow-up.
    Shi JY; Jie-Ni ; Zhuang LF; Zhang XM; Fan LF; Lai HC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191717. PubMed ID: 29401469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal bone loss and the risk indicators of fixed screw-retained implant-supported prostheses and fixed telescopic-retained implant-supported prostheses in full arch: A retrospective case-control study.
    Oda Y; Mori G; Honma S; Ito T; Iijima T; Yajima Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Jul; 32(7):818-827. PubMed ID: 33754378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Restorative angle of zirconia restorations cemented on non-original titanium bases influences the initial marginal bone loss: 5-year results of a prospective cohort study.
    Strauss FJ; Siegenthaler M; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I; Jung RE; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jul; 33(7):745-756. PubMed ID: 35570366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around implants supporting splinted fixed bridges: A retrospective study on 412 implants.
    Manfredini M; Poli PP; Beretta M; Rossi F; Rigoni M; Veronesi V; Maiorana C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 May; 35(5):547-559. PubMed ID: 38372478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Assessment of Short (> 6 mm and ≤ 8.5 mm) Implants in Posterior Sites with an Average Follow-Up of 74 Months: A Retrospective Study.
    Fernandes GVO; Ferreira NDRN; Heboyan A; Nassani LM; Pereira RMA; Fernandes JCH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Oct; 38(5):915-926. PubMed ID: 37847833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early histological, microbiological, radiological, and clinical response to cemented and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns.
    Thoma DS; Wolleb K; Bienz SP; Wiedemeier D; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29(10):996-1006. PubMed ID: 30238517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peri-implant bone loss in cement- and screw-retained prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Brandão ML; Vettore MV; Vidigal Júnior GM
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 23297703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term survival and success of zirconia screw-retained implant-supported prostheses for up to 12 years: A retrospective multicenter study.
    Pozzi A; Arcuri L; Fabbri G; Singer G; Londono J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 34187699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cemented vs screw-retained zirconia-based single implant reconstructions: A 3-year prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Kraus RD; Epprecht A; Hämmerle CHF; Sailer I; Thoma DS
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 21(4):578-585. PubMed ID: 30861635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority: a retrospective study.
    Alhammadi SH; Burnside G; Milosevic A
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):171. PubMed ID: 33794841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone and soft tissue outcomes, risk factors, and complications of implant-supported prostheses: 5-Years RCT with different abutment types and loading protocols.
    Göthberg C; Gröndahl K; Omar O; Thomsen P; Slotte C
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):313-321. PubMed ID: 29380510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates.
    Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Zwahlen M; Hämmerle CH; Schneider D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():163-201. PubMed ID: 23062142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical, radiographic, and immunological evaluation of angulated screw-retained and cemented single-implant crowns in the esthetic region: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Lv XL; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Gu YX; Lai HC; Shi JY
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 23(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 34390601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association of prosthetic features and peri-implantitis: A cross-sectional study.
    Yi Y; Koo KT; Schwarz F; Ben Amara H; Heo SJ
    J Clin Periodontol; 2020 Mar; 47(3):392-403. PubMed ID: 31912511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of the implant stability quotient in monitoring progressive peri-implant bone loss: An experimental study in dogs.
    Monje A; Insua A; Monje F; Muñoz F; Salvi GE; Buser D; Chappuis V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 30267449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Catena A; Pérez-Sayáns M; Fernández-Barbero JE; O'Valle F; Padial-Molina M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 24(5):630-642. PubMed ID: 35831919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Therapy of peri-implantitis with resective surgery. A 3-year clinical trial on rough screw-shaped oral implants. Part II: radiographic outcome.
    Romeo E; Lops D; Chiapasco M; Ghisolfi M; Vogel G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 17348882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal bone loss as success criterion in implant dentistry: beyond 2 mm.
    Galindo-Moreno P; León-Cano A; Ortega-Oller I; Monje A; O Valle F; Catena A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Apr; 26(4):e28-e34. PubMed ID: 24383987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonsubmerged implants in the treatment of the edentulous upper jaw: a prospective clinical and radiographic study of ITI implants--results after 1 year.
    Astrand P; Anzén B; Karlsson U; Sahlholm S; Svärdström P; Hellem S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 11359262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.